NAOREM NATASHA v. MANIPUR UNIVERSITY AND 3 ORS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-09-02. NAOREM NATASHA v. MANIPUR UNIVERSITY AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 621 of 2024 Naorem Natasha ….. Petitioner/s - Versus – Manipur University & 3 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA Order 02. 09. 2024 [1] Heard Mr. Th. Rajkishore, learned counsel for the petitioner. [2] The petitioner approached this Court for directing the respondents for consideration of the representation dated 23. 08. 2024 submitted by the petitioner and others to the Vice Chancellor, Manipur University for making promotional avenue including relaxation of age. [3] It is stated that the petitioner and other applicants working in Manipur Institute of Technology (MIT) for the past 20 years in the posts which have no promotional avenue. Recently, the Manipur University has issued an advertisement No. 1/2024 dated 01. 08.
2024 for recruitment of certain posts and the petitioner and others are eligible for applying in the post of Administrative Officer (MIT) except for the fact that some of them are overaged. By the common representation dated 23. 08. 2024, the petitioner and others have requested for relaxing the age limit. [4] Mr. Th. Rajkishore, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that writ petition may be disposed of at this stage by issuing a direction to the respondents by passing a speaking order on the representation 23. 08. 2024 submitted by the petitioner within a stipulated period of time. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the last date for submission of form is on 04. 09. 2024 and if the representation is decided in favour of the petitioner and other applicants, they may be permitted to submit form as a special rule. [5] Mr. BP.
Sahu, learned senior counsel for the respondent, is also agreeable to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner except for the fact that there is no provision for relaxing of age as well as for extending the last date of submission of form. [6] Recording the submissions made at the bar, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to dispose of the representation dated 23. 08. 2024 by passing a speaking order as per rule within a period of 2 (two) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. [7] This Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. However, in case, the representation is decided in favour of the petitioner, the respondents may consider his case for submission of form on an extended date, if possible. [8] With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. [9] Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for all the parties. JUDGE Kh. Joshua Maring Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA KH.
JOSHUA MARING Date: 2024. 09. 04 MARING 13:54:07 +05'30'
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.