SMT. LONGJAM RAMESHORI DEVI v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANRS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MV MURALIDARAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2020-10-21. SMT. LONGJAM RAMESHORI DEVI v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANRS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item –9 Digitally signed by Yumk Yumkham IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR Rother ham Date: AT IMPHAL 2020. 11. 02 Rother 17:02:15 +05'30' W. P. (C) No. 504 of 2020 (Through Video conference) Smt. Longjam Rameshori Devi, aged about 36 years, W/o Nahakpam Tomba Singh of Charangpat, Mayai Leikai, Thoubal Sub-Division, Thoubal District, Manipur-795138. …. Petitioner/s - Versus – 1. The State of Manipur, through its Commissioner Health Department, Government of Manipur, old Secretariat Complex at South Block, Manipur Secretariat, Imphal West, Manipur-795001; 2. The Director Health Services, Government of Manipur, Lamphelpat, opps. RIMS, Imphal West Manipur, Imphal-795001. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MV MURALIDARAN 21-10-2020 Today when the matter is taken up for admission, I heard Ms. L. Sillori, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Sundari, Ld. GA who appears for the respondents.
By consents of both the parties the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. [2] Ms. L. Sillori, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner represented before this Court that being a lady and having a child and completion of3(three) years of service in the place where she is working now, the petitioner submitted a representation to the Page 1 respondents on 24. 08. 2020 seeking to transfer to PHC, Charangpat. But the representation dated 24. 08. 2020 is unconsidered and the same is still pending with the respondents. Therefore, she filed this writ petition and seeking the prayer to suitable directions may be issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 24. 08. 2020 and to pass appropriate orders on her representation. [3] I also heard Mrs. Sundari, Ld. GA who takes notice and appeared for the respondents. [4] Mrs. Sundari, Ld. GA represented before this Court that the matter is coming for admission today only.
Therefore, she seeks time to get instruction. Anyhow, she represented that if this Court is inclined to pass any order to dispose of the representation dated 24. 08. 2020, she agreed for the same for considering the representation of the petitioner dated 24. 08. 2020 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders. Therefore, Mrs. Sundari, Ld. GA represented before this Court that 4(four) weeks’ time may be given for considering the petitioner’s representation dated 24. 08. 2020. [5] The request made by the petitioner is genuine only and being a lady, she completed 3(three) years of service in the present Page 2 place of working and her request may be considered by the respondents.
Therefore, without going into the merits and demerits of the case of the petitioner, I am inclined to pass the following orders:-a) the writ petition is disposed of; st b) the 1 respondent namely the State of Manipur, through its Commissioner Health Department is hereby directed to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 24. 08. 2020 by giving personal opportunity to the petitioner and to pass appropriate speaking order within a period of 4(four) weeks from the date of receipt of this order; c) Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No order of cost. JUDGE Larson Page 3
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.