M/S MAA TARINI RICE MILL, GANJAM v. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-22. M/S MAA TARINI RICE MILL, GANJAM v. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W. P. (C) No. 35838 of 2025 M/s. Maa Tarini Rice Mill .. …... Petitioner (s) Mr. Subham Sharma, Adv. -Versus- The Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Gosaninuagaon ……. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Tuna Sahu, Adv. CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER 22. 12. 2025 Order No. 03. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayer: “In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the present writ petition and issue a RULE NISI in the nature of Mandamus directing the Opposite Party Bank to act in terms of letter dated 18. 10. 2025 and to allow the Petitioner to pay the estimated outstanding liability (EOL) amount within 90 days from the invocation of Bank Guarantee i. e. , on or before 17. 01.
2026 for repayment of the entire amount of bank guarantee and if the Opposite Party fails to show cause or show insufficient cause for such illegal and arbitrary actions, shall make the Rule absolute in the interest of justice. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 23-Dec-2025 11:57:23 And further, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass any other order(s) or direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. ” 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Petitioner is directed to approach the Opposite Party/Bank with a decent proposal for settlement of his loan account which will be accepted th by the Bank on or before 24 December, 2025. In such event, the Bank shall consider the proposal in accordance with law.
If the Petitioner fails to turn up before the Opposite Party within the time stipulated above, the Opposite Party/Bank is free to proceed in accordance with law. 5. However, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioner th till 24 December, 2025. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 23-Dec-2025 11:57:23
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.