NAMBRAM AMULKUMAR v. MANIPUR UNIVERSITY AND 2 OTHERS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-03-07. NAMBRAM AMULKUMAR v. MANIPUR UNIVERSITY AND 2 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
56-57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 816 of 2023 with MC (WP(C)) No. 384 of 2023 Nambam Amulkumar … Petitioner -Versus- Manipur University & 2 Ors … Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA 7. 3. 2024 Heard Mr. Kishan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A. P. Sahu, learned counsel for respondent No. 1, Mr. Goutam, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 and Mr. Jasobanta, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. This Court issued Notice on 27. 11. 2023 and respondent No. 3 has filed counter affidavit. On perusal of the prayer made in the writ petition, one of the alternative prayers is for disposal of the representations submitted by the petitioner. Mr. Kishan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by passing an innocuous order directing the respondents to dispose of the representations filed by the petitioner, dated 31. 7. 2021, 9. 8. 2021, 18. 9. 2021 and 2. 8.
2023 by speaking order within a stipulated time. Mr. A. P. Sahu, learned counsel for the Manipur University is also agreeable to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner provided this court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. Mr. Goutam, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 and Mr. Jasobanta, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submit that this court may pass appropriate order. Considering the submission made at the Bar and the nature of the prayer, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the Registrar, Manipur University to dispose of the representations filed by the petitioner, dated 31. 7. 2021, 9. 8. 2021, 18. 9. 2021 and 2. 8. 2023 by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. Furnish a copy of this order to learned counsel for the parties.
JUDGE Priyojit Digitally signed JOHN by JOHN TELEN TELEN KOM Date: 2024. 03. 08 KOM 09:44:42 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.