M/s. Alkem Laboratories Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
Court: High Court of Sikkim
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Sikkim judgment dated 2025-07-30. M/s. Alkem Laboratories Limited v. Union of India and Ors. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Court No. 2 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of Proceedings WP(C) No. 41 of 2025 M/S ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Date: 30. 07. 2025 CORAM :THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE For Petitioner Mr. Arun Siwach, Advocate. Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Advocate. For Respondents Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Deputy Solicitor General of India. ORDER I. A. No. 01 of 2025 is an application filed on behalf of Respondent No. 4 seeking to place on record the subsequent developments in the present Writ Petition i. e. , a copy of the Office Memorandum dated 10- 07-2025, Clarification by the CBIC dated 18-07-2025 and Letter dated 22-07-2025, vide which the Assistant Commissioner, Gangtok, Division, Siliguri Central Goods and Service Tax, has ordered as follows; “ORDER I order to drop the Demand Note issued under No.
34/Demand Note/Budgetary Support/Alkem/Gtk- Div/2025-26 Date:01/07/2025 to M/s ALKEM LABORATORIES LIMITED [GSTIN – 11AABCA9521E1ZA] & Unique ID: 03/Gangtok/Siliguri/11AABCA9521E1ZA, Alkem Health Science, A Unit of Alkem Laboratories Limited [GSTIN – 11AABCA9521E1ZA] & Unique ID: UNQSBS 11AABCA9521E1ZA0003, Alkem Health Science, A Unit of Alkem Laboratories Limited Unit-2 [GSTIN – 11AABCA9521E1ZA] & Unique ID: UNQSBS11AABCA9521E1ZA0001, A Unit of Alkem Laboratories Limited Unit-3 [GSTIN – 11AABCA9521E1ZA] & Unique ID: UNQSBS11AABCA9521E1ZA0002, in terms of the DPIIT clarification letter issued under No. P- 66023/3/2025-GSTSS dated 10/07/2025 and the CBIC clarification issued under Letter No. CBIC- 110267/107/2023-CX. VIII SECTION-CBEC dated 18/07/2025. ………………………………………………………………………. ” In view of the said circumstances, both parties submit that the matter is rendered infructuous and may be disposed of accordingly.
Having considered the submissions of Learned Counsel for the opposing parties and perused the Order, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Judge 30. 07. 2025 ds/sdl
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.