MARIA ILDA MARGARIDA QUITEIRO E CORTEZ AND 2 ORS v. FOMENTO CORP. REP. BY DILIP TIMBLO AND 4 ORS
Court: Bombay High Court
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BHARAT P. DESHPANDE
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2024-10-03. MARIA ILDA MARGARIDA QUITEIRO E CORTEZ AND 2 ORS v. FOMENTO CORP. REP. BY DILIP TIMBLO AND 4 ORS. Read the...
Judgment text
2024:BHC-GOA:1674 CP 3 of 2023 vinita IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 3 OF 2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2008 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 3 OF 2023 MARIA ILDA MARGARIDA QUITEIRO E CORTEZ AND 2 ORS ... PETITIONERS Versus FOMENTO CORP. REP. BY DILIP TIMBLO AND 4 ORS ... RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2008 MARIA ILDA MARGARIDA QUITEIRO E CORTEZ AND 2 ORS. , ... PETITIONER Versus FOMENTO CORP. REPRESENTED BY DILIP TIMBLO ... RESPONDENT Mr P. Sawant, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr P. Talaulikar, Advocate for the respondent no. 3. CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 3rd October, 2024 P. C. Mr P. Talaulikar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3 hands in a cheque of Rs. 126695/- towards arrears of salary as directed by this Court vide order dated 27. 8. 2018 in Writ Petition No. 293 of 2008. 2. Mr Talaulikar submits that reasons for non compliance is that affairs of the company was earlier looked after by respondent no.
4 3rd October, 2024 CP 3 of 2023 alone and after business was shut down, present respondent no. 3 was under the impression that respondent no. 4 would comply with the order. Only after receipt of the notice of contempt of this Court, respondent no. 3 realised about non compliance and immediately paid and acknowledged the payment by cheque today. It is the contention of Mr Talaulikar, that there is no deliberate intention not to comply with the orders of this Court. 3. Such contentions are considered. 4. Since the amount is now paid, the contempt application stands disposed of in above terms. BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. Signed by: VINITA VIKAS NAIK Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 05/10/2024 10:29:29 3rd October, 2024
Source: Bombay High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.