ANANDA MAHATO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-05-04. ANANDA MAHATO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2034 of 2026 1. Ananda Mahato aged about 60 years son of Late Hari Mahato residence of Village- Dumdumi, P. O. & P. S. - Bindapathar, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. 2. Puna Mahato aged about 56 years son of Ananda Mahato residence of Village- Dumdumi, P. O. & P. S. -Bindapathar, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. 3. Madhuri Mahato aged about 24 years wife of Jiyaram Mahato residence of Village- Dumdumi, P. O. & P. S. - Bindapathar, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. 4. Ajit Mahato aged about 48 years son of Chhoku Mahato residence of Village- Tarra, P. O. & P. S. -Bindapathar, District- Jamtara. 5. Ananda Mahato aged about 58 years son of Chhoku Mahato Village- Tarra, P. O. & P. S. Bindapathar, District- Jamtara. 6. Jiyaram Mahato aged about 30 years son of Ananda Mahato residence of Village- Dumdumi, P. O. & P. S. -Bindapathar, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. 7.
Niranjan Mahato aged about 39 years son of Late Mathan Mahato residence of Village Chandwa,P. O. - Bhabhangama, P. S. - Sarath, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . …. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A. P. P 02/ 04. 05. 2026: The matter relates to Bindapathar P. S. Case No. 75/2025, pending in the Court of learned S. D. J. M, Jamtara. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to move before the learned court by way of filing regular bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the State has got no objection. 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5.
If the petitioners move before the learned court by way of filing regular bail the same shall be decided in accordance with law without being prejudice to this order. Dt. 04. 05. 2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) satyarthi-
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.