Kandi Sai Kumar v. The state of Telengana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.LAKSHMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-15. Kandi Sai Kumar v. The state of Telengana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CR. IMINAL PETITION NO: 654O AF 2o2a Between: 1. Kandi Sai Kumar, Son of Sailoo, 2. Muddangula Susheela, 3. Shoukath Pasha @Yakub, 4. Mitddangala Srini,zas, Petitioners/Accused No. 2 to 5 AtTD -l-he state of Telengane, Rep by SHO PS Jakranpay, Nizamabad d rst Respondent/Com plaina nt Petition under Section 438 of Cr. P. C, praying that in the circurnstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the Fligh Court may be pleased to pass an order by grantlng anticipatory bail directing the respondent police to release the Petitioners/Accused No" 2 to 5 on bail to the satisfaction of the SHO of PS Jakranpally,Nizamabad Dist in Cr No.
152 of 2020 in the event their arrest by the respondent police in the interest of justice The petition cominq on for hearing upon perusing the Petition and the grr. ;unds filed in support thereof arrd upon ,At hearlng the argr:ments of SRI STRAIY SHARI'{A Advocate for the-'- --= Petitione, and the PUBI-IC PROSECUTOR for the Responderrt, the a' Court made the following. ORDER: t I,]{E HON'BLE JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CITIMINAL PETITION No. 664O of 2O2O ORDER: This application is filed seeking anticipatory bail. The petitioners are A2 to A5 in Crime No. l52 of 2O2O of Jakranpally Police Station, \izamabad District. The oflence alleged against the petitioners is r-rnder Section 379 lPC. Heard le:Lrned counsel lor the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Pr'rused the record. On the : asis of the confession statement of A 1 , the police have included the names of the petitioners in the above crime. ln the complaint, the names of the petitioners are not mentioned.
As stated above, alter arrest of A1, on his confession, the names of the petitioners wer,3 included in the present crime. The police have alreadl, arrest{ld ,{1 and he was enlarged on bail. Bven in the remand report also, it is mentioned that the stolen property rvas recovered from A. 1. Considering the said aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein. Accordin5lly, this Criminal Petition is aliowed. 'fhe petitioners are directed to surrender belore the Station House Officer, Jakranpalll, Po lice Station, u'ithin a period of i 5 days from the date of this orrler. On such surrcnder, the said Station [-louse Officer shall re,lease the petitioners on bail on thcir executing personal bonds for a sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five rhousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum each to his satisfaction. I'r-. titioner Nos. 1, 3, 4l A2, A4 and A5 shall appear before the saicl Station House Officer, on every Sunday between ---l 10. 00 AM and 5.
O0 PM, till completion of investigation and filing of final report. Miscellaneous petitions, il any, pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed. . SD/ CH,VENKATESIVARI-U ASS]S IANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER To 1 The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court at Armoor. 2 The Station House,pfficer, PS Jakranpay, Nizamabad District I 3 One CC to SRl. SrRAtt/ SHARIVA Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad. [OUT] 5 One Spare Copy HIGH COURT KLJ DATED 1511212020 s &' ORDER CRLP. No. 6640 of 2020 BAIL
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.