ANUJ SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-10. ANUJ SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9410 of 2020 1. Anuj Sahu 2. Anand Sahu 3. Manita Devi … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar Ganjhu, Adv. For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Spl. P. P. 02 /10. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over. In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Sissai P. S. Case No. 113 of 2020 registered under sections 20(B)(ii)(b) of NDPS Act, 1985.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were involved in business of cannabis seeds (ganja) illegally and after search 1. 600 kgs cannabis seeds (ganja) was seized from their shop. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the alleged cannabis seeds (ganja) is much less than commercial quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 11. 09. 2020 as mentioned in paragraph 13 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Spl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in connection with Sissai P. S. Case No. 113 of 2020 with the condition that they will cooperate with the trial of the case. Pappu/ (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. )
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.