SURAJ KUMAR POLAI @ SURAJ POLAI v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-17. SURAJ KUMAR POLAI @ SURAJ POLAI v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 14121 of 2025 1. Suraj Kumar Polai @ …. Petitioners Suraj Polai 2. Tulu Bisoyi Mr. S. K. Mahanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panda, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH ORDER Order 17. 12. 2025 No. 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G. R. Case No. 790 of 2025 pending on the file of learned J. M. F. C. , Kabisuryanagar, arising out of Kabisuryanagar P. S. Case No. 804 of 2025 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 324(4), 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that because of the counter case exaggerated allegations have been made. Hence, the Petitioners may be protected by pre-arrest bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail during the currency of investigation. 5.
Taking into account the nature of allegations and the punishment prescribed, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedent of similar nature and the nature of the injury. 6. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioners have any such criminal antecedent and the injured has suffered any grievous injury, this order shall not be given effect to. 7. It is directed that the Petitioners shall not in any way try to intimidate or threaten the Informant or his family. 8. It shall be open for the prosecution/Informant to seek variance of this order, if there is any threat perception. 9. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 10. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V.
NARASINGH) Judge Jina Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: JINA DIGAL Page 2 of 2 Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 19-Dec-2025 13:58:07
Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.