Skip to main content
LawSphereX

VIDHYADHAR EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANOTHER v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND OTHERS

Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-12-28. VIDHYADHAR EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANOTHER v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and...

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5352 of 2020. Date of Decision : December 28, 2020. Vidyadhar Education Society & Another ... Petitioners. Versus State of H. P. & Others ... Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE Anoop Chitkara, Judge (oral). Challenging the order passed by Debt Recovery Tribunal, Chandigarh as well as demand notice, issued with respect to property under mortgage, the petitioner Society through its President as well as private petitioner Smt. Meera Garg, have come up before this Court. 2. At the very outset, we clarify that this Court has no jurisdiction of this Court to entertain any matter where the appeal is provided under the SARFAESI Act.

Reference be also made to the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 1281 of 2019, titled Authorized Officer, State Bank of Travancore and Another versus Mathew KC. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3. Mr. Arvind Sharma, learned counsel representing the respondent-Bank submits that let the petitioner-Society apply for OTC, which will be considered by the Bank provided the petitioner pay some funds before applying for such a scheme. 4. Without going into the merits of the petition and without expressing any opinion about the prayer clause, we dispose of the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to apply to the respondent- Bank for OTS, subject to payment of Rupees Seven Lacs within seven days. Subject to the aforesaid payment on or before 4. 1. 2021, the Bank shall not take any coercive steps till the decision of the OTS application. It is clarified that in case the petitioner fails to deposit Rupees Seven Lacs on or before 4. 1.

2021, the interim protection granted vide order dated 19. 11. 2020, shall stand vacated automatically. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice. (Anoop Chitkara), Judge December 28, 2020 (ps)

Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.