Uppu Satishand 3 others v. The State of Telangana and another
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-12. Uppu Satishand 3 others v. The State of Telangana and another. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
I [ 3257 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 704 OF 2023 Between: 1. Uppu Satish s/o Ganga Ram, age 35 years,Occ. Pvt. Employee. residing in Polasa Village of Jagtial Revenue Mandal and District. 2. Uppu Ganga Ram, S/o Dubba Ra1am, age 62 years,Occ. Agriculture residing in Gollapalli Road, Jagtial Revenue Mandal and District. 3. Jangili Jamuna, Wo Parameshwar, age 42 years, Occ_ Agriculture residing in Gollapalli Road, Jagtial Revenue Mandal and District. 4. Uppu Kishan, S/o Gangarajam, age 30 years,Occ. Agriculture residing in Polasa Village of Jagtial Revenue Mandal and District. ... Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1,2,3 & 5 AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2. Aku ta Deepth i u '"Trj:'l? :' @ u pp u vasa nrh a. w/o Satish, age :?
"r:::r1tff R/o Polasa village Jagtial presently residing in Bheemuni Dubba, Koratla. ... RespondenUDe-facto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash proceedings in CC No. 315 ot 2022 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Koratla filed against the petitioners. l. A. NO: 1OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in CC No. 3'15 of 2O22 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Koratla including trial pending disposal of the quash application. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms.
C Rohini Smitha, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOI"IRABLE SMT. JUSTICE JIIWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7O4 of 2o23 ORDER: When the matter is taken up lor hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that during the pendency of the criminal petition to quash the CC, the matter has been compromised between the parties, the matter has bt:come infructuous. Recordirrg the aforesaid submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall slar-rd closed Sd/- A. S RINIVASA REDDY TRAR ,/TRUE COPY'/ FICER \ To Kor{]a. ' First Class' 1. The Judicial Magistrate of ioratla Police Station' Jastial Uout" Oiti"lt' 2. The Station state of relangana at prori"'plir. "ii;;: High court for the to rhe 3 Two ccs Hvderabad [OUT) Advocate [oPUCl Roninismitha' , ljL"=#I;tilc 5.
Two CD CoPies ADt(gh % HIGH COURT DATED:1 211212024 STA 1 $E T ). ]J ORDER 2025 il tl 3 18 t[B \''. CRLP. No. 704 of 2023 \ t) (" t9 : DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS IO bD
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.