Golmeilan Jeevan v. OFFICER IN CHARGE,PATSOI POLICE STATION
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-06-07. Golmeilan Jeevan v. OFFICER IN CHARGE,PATSOI POLICE STATION. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Suppl. item no. 5 & 6 OINAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR THOIBA MEITEI AT IMPHAL Digitally signed by AB No. 15 of 2024 OINAM THOIBA MEITEI With Date: 2024. 06. 10 Crl. M. C. No. 15 of 2024 12:56:42 +05'30' Golmeilan Jeevan …. Petitioner - Versus - The Officer in Charge Patsoi Police Station …. Respondent B E F O R E HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU 07. 06. 2024 Heard Mr. D. Julius Riamei, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. H. Samarjit, learned PP appearing for the State respondent. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr. H. Samarjit, learned PP for the State respondent. The present application has been filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, praying for granting an interim bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest by the Police in connection with FIR No. 15(4)2024 PSI PS U/S 307/325/34-IPC.
The learned PP for the State respondent requested to give some time to file counter affidavit in response to the application filed by the petitioner. As prayed for by the learned PP for the State respondent, 2 (two) weeks’ time is given for filing counter affidavit. In the meantime at the interim, in the event of the arrest of the accused/petitioner, the Investigating Officer (I. O. ) of the case is directed to release the accused/petitioner on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. It is also made clear that the accused/petitioner should co-operate with the investigation and he should make himself available for interrogation by the I. O. of the FIR case as and when required. The accused/petitioner should not leave the State of Manipur without prior permission of the arresting authority.
It is further, made clear that if the accused/petitioner violates any of the conditions given hereinabove, the respondent is at liberty to approach this Court for modification or cancellation of this interim order. The present Crl. M. C. No. 15 of 2024 is disposed of. List the main petition on 20. 06. 2024. JUDGE Thoiba
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.