BSLR INFRASTRUCTURES v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: E.V. VENUGOPAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-05. BSLR INFRASTRUCTURES v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 32ee ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL Between: BSLR INFRASTRYTIy_IE:, gy its D. irector Bommiredgy Larshma Fgp Reddy s/o Bommireddv abeut 46-Vearc, [rtlf,^q. F"! Qv,. Aged occ- Business, R/o H. No. G-1a1hbt4o1, Akruthis arifibarE@m, nolo'No'4, KTR. cotony, Nizampet, Bachupally, Medchal Malkajgiri District-500090. ... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of relangarlg, by,its. principal. Secretary, Bep Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Tank bund, HyderabiO 2- The Commissioner, and lnspector General of Stamps and Registration, r M. J. Market, Hyderabad, Telangina State. 3. The District Registrar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 4. The sub-Registrar, Quthbullapur, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 5. The District Collector, Medchal-Matkajgiri District ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering my representation dated 15. 11. 2025 for removal of land an extent of 280 Sq Yards in survey no 4911A, situated at bachupally village, bachupally Tahasildar/mandal, medchal malkajgiri district and an extent of 534 Sq yards in survey no 4911A, situated at bachupally village, bachupally Tahasildar/mandal, medchal malkajgiri district from prohibition list which is itlegal, arbitrary, withobt jurisdiction, contrary to the provisions of Registration Act-1g0g, violation of Article 14 of constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent no 5 to consider my representation.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith consider my representation dated 29. og. 2o2s for removing of sy no 4gg P in bachupally village, euthbullapur mandal, medchat malkajgiri district from the prohibition list. counsel for the petitioner: sRr VTSHNUVARDHAN GouD REPRESENTTNG G. VENKAT RATNAM GOUD counsel for the Respondents: sRr L. RAVTNDER AGp FoR REVENUE The Court made the foltowing: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL IITRIT PETITION No. 37384 of 2O2S Dated: O5. 12. 2O25 Between: BSLR [nfrastructures ... Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary and four others ..
Respondents ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering my representation dated L5. I1. 2025 for removal of land an extent of 280 Sq Yards in survey no. 491/A, situated at bachupally village, bachupalty Tahasildar/mandal, medchal malkajgiri district and an extent of 534 sq yrds in survey to 49llA situated at bachupally village, bachupalty Tahasildar/Mandal, medchal malkajgiri district from prohibition list which is illegal, arbitrar5r, without jurisdiction, contrar5r to the'provisions of Registration Act-1908, Violation of Article L4 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no 5 to consider my representation and pass order and pass such other relief or reliefs... " 2. Heard Mr. Vishnuvardhan Goud, learned counsel representing Mr. G.
Venkat Ratnam Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing on-line and Mr. L. Ravinder, learned AssistlnEGovernment Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. Perused the record. 3. when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a direction to official respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 15. 11-2o2s submitted by the petitioner, requesting to remove the subject land from the list of prohibited properties. 4- Learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue seeks short span of time to pass appropriate orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel, this court, without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to direct the official respondent No. S to examine the representation dated 15. 11.
2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiousry as possible, by putting the interested parties on notice and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing. 6. with the above direction this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ANT //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, State 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Depart! 'nelt, Secretariat Buildings, Tank bund, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner, and lnspector General of Stamps and Registration, M. J. Market, Hyderabad, Telangana State' 3. The District Registrar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 4. The Sub-Registrar, Quthbullapu r, Medchal-Malkajg iri District. 5. The District Collector, tvledchal-Malkajgiri District 6. One CC to SRI G. VENKAT RATNAM GOUD, Advocate [OPUC] At 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana. HyderabadlOUTl 8.
Two CD Copies DAN Ary LS HIGH COURT DATED:0511212025 \ '*;. \' t ,:. l 'it: 17 ric frffi ORDER WP. No. 37384 of 2025 \i - ,/jr. ,.. -_- 1l,ri,' \. ,' '- . -:-:-_-. . - - -:. -, - . ---' DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION ouT cosTs \'t/ \9
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.