MANRISHAM SINGH v. JASWINDER KAUR AND ANR
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-09-24. MANRISHAM SINGH v. JASWINDER KAUR AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHCHANDIGARH (247) CRM-M-50896-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 24. 09. 2025 24. 09. 2025 MANRISHAM SINGHMANRISHAM SINGH ……Petitioner……Petitioner Versus JASWINDER KAUR AND ANRJASWINDER KAUR AND ANR ……Respondents……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAINALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. Sumit Tiwana, Advocate forMr. Sumit Tiwana, Advocate for Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of thepresent petition has been filed seeking quashing of thepresent petition has been filed seeking quashing of the ordersorders dated dated 17. 11. 2017 17. 11.
2017, wherebywhereby the the application application for for ad ad-interiminterim maintenance filed by the respondentmaintenance filed by the respondent-wife under Section 125 Cr. P. C. waswife under Section 125 Cr. P. C. waswife under Section 125 Cr. P. C. was allowed andand order dated 08. 10. 2021 whereby criminal rwhereby criminal revision filed by theevision filed by the petitioner was subsequently dismissed. petitioner was subsequently dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during theLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that during theLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the interregnum, the parties have amicably resolved their differences and areinterregnum, the parties have amicably resolved their differences and areinterregnum, the parties have amicably resolved their differences and areinterregnum, the parties have amicably resolved their differences and are now living together peacefully.
Accordingly, the petitionernow living together peacefully. Accordingly, the petitionernow living together peacefully. Accordingly, the petitioner does not wish to does not wish to pursue the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. pursue the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. pursue the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for theIn view of the statement made by learned counsel for theIn view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner,petitioner,petitioner,petitioner, the the the the present present present present petition petition petition petition is is is is dismissed dismissed dismissed dismissed as as as as withdrawn, withdrawn, withdrawn, withdrawn, without without without without expressing any opinion on the merits oexpressing any opinion on the merits of the case. f the case. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) September 24, 2025September 24, 2025 JUDGE manju Whether speaking/reasoned:Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.