SRI VIKAS S @ MALLIKARJUNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: M.NAGAPRASANNA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-17. SRI VIKAS S @ MALLIKARJUNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRL. P No. 17256 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17256 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI VIKAS S @ MALLIKARJUNA @ MALLIKA @ MALLA S/O SRI SRIKANTH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 25 TH 17 MAIN ROAD BEHIND RADHAKRISHNA SCHOOL SRINAGARA, BANASHANAKARI BENGALURU – 560 050. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANJUNATH V. , ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HANUMANTHANAGARA POLICE STATION BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI B. N. JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRL. P IS FILED U/S 439 CR. P. C (U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER HEREIN ON BAIL IN - 2 - CRL. P No. 17256 of 2025 CR. NO. 309/2018 OF HANUMANTHANAGAR P. S. , BENGALURU, SPLIT-UP IN SC. NO. 1204/2024 BY S. C. NO. 291/2019, PENDING BEFORE HON’BLE LXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-70) FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.
143, 302, 144, 146, 147 R/W 149 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking his enlargement on bail in SC No. 291 of 2019 which is split up in S. C. No. 1204 of 2024. 2. Heard Sri Manjunath V, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and Sri B N Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent. 3. The petitioner gets embroiled in a crime in Crime No. 309 of 2018 of Hanumanthangar police station, which is now tried by the Court of Session in SC No. 1204 of 2024. It is - 3 - CRL. P No. 17256 of 2025 not that the petitioner was not granted bail earlier. The crime was registered in the year 2018. The petitioner was enlarged on bail on police filing a charge sheet. The bail stands cancelled on the score that the petitioner failed to appear before the Court, on a non-bailable warrant being issued. 4.
In the light of the fact that the petitioner had been granted bail earlier and it stood cancelled on the score that the petitioner failed to appear before the Court on particular dates, the petition deserves to succeed, while directing that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court as and when directed or when the matter is listed. 5. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and bail that was granted to the petitioner on 23-10-2019 in Crl. P. No. 6906 of 2019 is restored, with the same conditions that were ordained when bail was granted to the petitioner. Sd/- (M. NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BKP/List No. : 2 Sl No. : 12
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.