SUDARSHAN BODRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-05-07. SUDARSHAN BODRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2026:JHHC:13690] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3798 of 2026 ------ 1. Sudarshan Bodra aged about 34 years, Son of late Suleman Bodra, Resident of Village Kuria, P. O. & P. S. Adki/Arki, District Khunti, Jharkhand. 2. Sukhram Munda, aged about 21 years, Son of Birsa Munda, Resident of village Kuria, Tobga, P. O. & P. S. Adki/Arki, District Khunti, Jharkhand. 3. Kande Munda aged about 28 years, Son of Bhaiya Ram Munda, Resident of village Kuria, Badikmir, P. O. Kander, P. S. Adki/Arki, District Khunti, Jharkhand Permanently Resident of village Bhaiya Royda, P. O. P. S. Rugudih, District Keojhar, Odisha. 4. Abraham Bodra aged about 38 years, Son of Late Mangra Bodra, Resident of village Kuria, Badikir, P. O. Kande, P. S. Adki/Arki, District Khunti, Jharkhand. 5. Maskalan Topno aged about 33 years, Son of Sudarshan Topno, Resident of village Saipur, Jitiatoli, P. O. & P. S. Kolebira, District Simdega, Jharkhand. .... .... ….
Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl. P. P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-07-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Kolebira P. S. Case No. 09 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 18, 27(a), 28, 29 30 of the N. D. P. S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners was that the petitioners were involved in cultivation of poppy plants. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioners have no concern with the place of occurrence land. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 21. 02. 2026 as is evident from para-18 of the instant bail application.
It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-18 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertake not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, N. D. P. S. Act, Simdega in connection with Kolebira P. S. Case No.
09 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. ) Dated:- 07. 05. 2026 Saroj/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.