Shri Bhabani Sarkar v. The State of Tripura and 3 others
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2026-03-25. Shri Bhabani Sarkar v. The State of Tripura and 3 others. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C)No. 145 of 2026 Shri Bhabani Sarkar, S/O- Late Prangopal Sarkar, Resident of Hrishi Arbinda Palli, Amarpur, P. S- Birganj, District- Gomati, Tripura, PIN - 799101 …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Tripura represented by the Secretary, Department of Panchayat, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Agartala, West Tripura. 2. The Director of Panchayat, Government of Tripura, Agartala, West Tripura. 3. The District Magistrate and Collector, Gomati District, Udaipur, Tripura. 4. The Block Development Officer, Amarpur Rural Development Block, Gomati District, Tripura. …. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samar Das, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dipankar Sarma, Addl. GA. Date of hearing and : 25. 03. 2026 Dlivery of Judgment/ Order Yes No Whether fit for reporting : =B=E=F=O=R=E= HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA Judgment and order (Oral) Heard Ld. Counsel of both sides.
[2] With consent of both sides, this writ petition is being disposed of as agreed by the parties at this motion stage. [3] The petitioner went on superannuation as Panchayat Supervisor on attaining the age of 60 years on 30. 11. 2025. But his post retiral benefits have not been released to him till date. In this regard he submitted a representation on 17. 02. 2026 (Annexure-3) to Respondent No. 4, but same has also not been responded by the respondents despite one month has elapsed. [4] Ld. Counsel, Mr. Samar Das, for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of said representation in a time bound manner. [5] Ld. Addl. GA, Mr. D. Sarma, representing all the respondents has not opposed the same. [6] In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 17. 02.
2026 (Annexure-3) of the petitioner in accordance with law within 1(one) month of receipt of the copy of this Judgment. With such direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim Application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Digitally signed by MUNNA MUNNA SAHASAHADate: 2026. 03. 26 15:25:22+05'30' Saikat Sarma
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.