DEVANAND SOPANRAO GHULE AND ORS. v. RAJEEV SHIVNATH SONKAR
Court: Bombay High Court
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2020-12-18. DEVANAND SOPANRAO GHULE AND ORS. v. RAJEEV SHIVNATH SONKAR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (STAMP) NO. 96056 OF 2020 Rajeev S Soankar …Petitioner Versus Devanand Sopanrao Ghule & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3804 OF 2020 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 94548 OF 2020 Devanand S Ghule & Ors …Appellants Versus Rajeev S Soankar …Respondent Sitesh Sharma, with Vijay Upadhyay, for the Petitioner in ARP(ST)/96056/2020 and Respondent in ARP(ST)/94548/2020. Mr Mayur Khandeparkar, i/b Chaitanya Nikte, for the Respondent in ARP(ST)/96056/2020 and Petitioner in ARP(ST)/94548/2020. Shephali Mormare CORAM: G. S. PATEL, J Digitally signed by Shephali Mormare (Through Video Conference) Date: 2020. 12. 21 10:33:02 +0530 DATED: 18th December 2020 PC:- 18th December 2020 1. Heard through video conferencing. 2.
Mr Khandeparkar on instructions states that his clients, the Respondents in the Section 9 Petition and Appellant in the Arbitration Appeal are withdrawing the termination notice in question. The statement is noted and accepted. 3. In view of this, Mr Sharma seeks leave to withdraw the Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act. Mr Khandeparkar seeks leave to withdraw the Arbitration Appeal and the pending Interim Application. 4. Both matters are dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In view of this, the interim order under Section 9 passed by the District Judge, Pune, also stands vacated. 6. Consequently, Mr Sharma states that his client will withdraw the Special Civil Suit No. 336 of 2020 filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division at Pune. This is also accepted as an undertaking to the Court. 7. Similarly, Mr Sharma will also withdraw the Section 9 petition filed before the District Judge, Pune. This is also accepted as an undertaking to the Court. 8.
Mr Sharma’s client will make the necessary applications within a period of one week from today for leave to unconditionally withdraw 18th December 2020 the Suit and the Section 9 petition. If that is not done by Mr Sharma’s client, liberty to Mr Khandeparkar’s client to place a copy of this order before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune and the District Jude, Pune for suitable orders. 9. There will be no orders as to costs. 10. This order is passed in the presence on video conferencing hearing of Mr Rajeev S Soankar and Devanand S Ghule. 11. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary of this Court. All concerned will act on production of a digitally signed copy of this order. (G. S. PATEL, J) 18th December 2020
Source: Bombay High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.