BUDHU NAG CHATAR ALIAS BUDHU PATOR ALIAS BUDHU PATAR NAG v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-20. BUDHU NAG CHATAR ALIAS BUDHU PATOR ALIAS BUDHU PATAR NAG v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10867 of 2024 ------ Budhu Nag Chatar @ Budhu Pator @ Budhu Patar Nag, aged about 37 years, son of Late Pandu Patar Nag @ Pandu Nag Chatar, resident of village- Jarjatta, P. O. Nakti, P. S. - Karaikela, District- Singhbhum West- Jharkhand … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the State : M/s. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, A. P. P. ----- 02/20. 12. 2024 Heard the parties 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S. T. Case No. 336 of 2022 arising out of Gudri P. S. Case No. 07 of 2019, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 452, 379, 427, 436 and 506 of the I. P. C. and Section 17 of the C. L. A. Act and Section 10/13 of the U. A. P. Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chakradharpur (Chaibasa). 3.
Bail Application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide B. A. No. 8092 of 2023 by order dated 11. 10. 2023. 4. The petitioner is a member of naxal organization. On 22. 06. 2019, petitioner alongwith co-accused persons set ablaze three tractors standing outside the house of the informant. Accused persons also took away Rs. 60,000/- which was kept in his house. 5. While rejecting the Bail Application of the petitioner, Trial Court was directed to expedite the trial and preferably conclude the same within nine months from the next date fixed for recording of the evidence. 6. Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that no witness has been examined in this case till today. It was further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 14. 02. 2022. 7. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, learned A. P. P. has opposed the prayer for bail. 8. Considering the submissions made above, I am inclined to release the petitioner, on bail.
Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Chakradharpur (Chaibasa) in connection with S. T. Case No. 336 of 2022 arising out of Gudri P. S. Case No. 07 of 2019. (Ambuj Nath, J. ) Nandini/- Uploaded
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.