NURUL AMIN KHANDOKAR v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 8 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-07-14. NURUL AMIN KHANDOKAR v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 8 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 10 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 46 of 2026 Date of Decision: 14. 07. 2026 Shri Nurul Amin Khandokar son of (L) Nazrul Islam Khandokar, resident of Tosilderpara P. O & PS Mahendraganj, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya Personnel & Admv. Reforms (B) Department, Meghalaya, Shillong. 3. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya Health & Family Welfare Department, Meghalaya, Shillong 4. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya Finance (Pension Cell) Department, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong. 5. The Director of Health Services (MI), Meghalaya, Shillong. 6. The District Medical & Health Officer, West Garo Hills, Tura. 7. The District Medical and Health Officer, South West Garo Hills, Ampati. 8. The Treasury Officer, Ampati District Treasury, South West Garo Hills, Meghalaya. 9.
The Principal Accountant General (A&E) Meghalaya, Shillong. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S. A. Sheikh, Adv. Mr. M. R. Marak, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. S. Bhattacharjee, GA for R1-8. Ms. E. B. Passah, Adv. for R 9. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. S. A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 2, the Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Personnel & Admv. Reforms (B) Department, the matter can be closed. 2. Ms. S. Bhattacharjee, learned GA for the State respondents has also submitted that the Cabinet in its meeting held on 30-06-2026, was pleased to approve the proposal of regularisation, and the same has also been reflected in the affidavit. 3.
Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, and the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 2, nothing remains for consideration and the writ petition is closed and disposed of. 4. It is expected that the entire exercise should be completed preferably within a period of four months. Judge
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.