SMT. PARMESHWARI v. SHIKHAR AGARWAL AND ORS
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-01-20. SMT. PARMESHWARI v. SHIKHAR AGARWAL AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Writ Contempt No. 915 / 2017 Smt. Parmeshwari W/o Sh. Prithviraj, Aged About 60 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Chak 9H, Tehsil Anoopgarh, Distirct Sri Ganganagar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Sh. Shikhar Agarwal, Secretary, Water Resources Department Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Sh. Ram Singh, Superintending Engineer Water Resources Department Anoopgarh, Branch Shri Vijaynagar, District Sri Gangangar. 3. Sh. Naveen Kumar Gupta, Executive Engineer Water Resources Department Anoopgarh, Branch Shri Vijaynagar, District Sri Gangangar. 4. Sh. Mahesh Kumar Kalra, Assistant Engineer Water Resources Sub Division Stone No. 195 Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar. 5. State of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Sushil Bishnoi For Respondents : Mr. Durga Ram for Mr. N. S. Rajpurohit, Dy. G. C.
_____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Order 04/12/2017 The present contempt petition has been filed for violation of the Order dated 06. 11. 2015 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8104/2012. Learned counsel for the respondents states that the matter was considered in accordance with the orders passed by this Court and accordingly, the petitioner has been granted Barabandi and the water shall be released to him within two weeks. (2 of 2) [WCP-915/2017] This Court has no doubt that the water will be accordingly released to the petitioner within two weeks. In view of the above, this Court does not deem it proper to continue with the contempt proceedings. Dismissed accordingly. Rule is discharged. However, in case the water is not released to the petitioner within the stipulated period, he will be at liberty to move an appropriate application for revival of the contempt petition.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR), J. Inder/16
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.