KAVALAKKATT SEBASTIAN PAUL v. THE STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-07-23. KAVALAKKATT SEBASTIAN PAUL v. THE STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. M. MANOJ RD TUESDAY, THE 23 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 1ST SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 9581 OF 2014 PETITIONER/S: KAVALAKKATT SEBASTIAN PAUL S/O. LATE SEBASTIAN,KAVALAKKATT HOUSE,NEAR BISHOP ALAPPAT HOSPITAL,P. O KARANCHIRA,VIA KATTOOR,THRISSUR DIST,PIN 680 702 REPRSENTED BY HIS POWE OF ATTORNEY SHRI JOHNSON K. D,AGED 61 YEARS ,S/O. LATE DEVASSYKAVALAKKATT HOUSE,NEAR BISHOP ALAPPATT HOSPITAL,P. O KARANCHIRA,VIA KATTOOR,THRISSUR DIST KERALA PIN 680 702. BY ADVS. SRI. M. A. BABY SRI. P. A. AUGUSTIAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,GOVRNMENTOF KERALA 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER KUTTUR VILLAGE,P. O KUTTUR,THRISSUR DIST, KERALA PIN 680 013 3 THE SECRETARY, KOLAZHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT,P. O. MULAMKUNNATHUKKAVU,THRISSUR DIST, KERALA PIN 680 581 4 THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER KOLAZHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT,P. O MULANKUNNATHUKAVU,THRISSUR DIST KERALA PIN 680 581 BY ADVS. SMT. R. RAJITHA SRI. P.
SANTHOSH PODUVAL SRI. K. D. SREEVISAKH OTHER PRESENT: R1 AND 2 – SRI. E. G. GORDEN, -SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23. 07. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W. P. (C) No. 9581 of 2014 J U D G M E N T The petitioner preferred this writ petition challenging Ext. P12 order and Ext. P13 circular and seeks to quash the conditions therein by issuing writ of certiorari or any other writ and further for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to effect necessary correction in the Basic Tax Register relating to the land covered under Ext. P1 Sale deed as ‘Dry land’ by deleting the word ‘Nilam’ and also to issue possession certificate to the petitioner with respect to the property in dispute. Today, when the matter was taken up, it is informed by the counsel for the petitioner that nothing survives with respect to the prayers sought in the writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. Sd/- P. M.
MANOJ JUDGE SM APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9581/2014 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO 2485/2013 DATED 04-06-2013 OF SUB REGISTRAR,AYYANTHGOLE TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO 4327/2011 DATED 30-11-2011 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO 2125/1985 DATED 01-07-1985 TRUE COPY OF THE SLAE DEED NO 2687/1973 DATED 16-08-1973 TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCEC CERTIFICATE DATED 30-04-2013 OF SUB REGISTRAR,AYYANTHOLE TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPTS DATED 28-05-2013 TRUE COPY OF THE REGULARIZATION FEE RECEIPTS DATED 28-05-2013 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT NO 5496519 DATED 9-07- 2013 TRUE COPY OF RTI AND ITS REPLY BY RESPONDENT NO 2 TRUE COPY OF RTI AND ITS REPLY BY RESPONDENt NO 3 TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO A1-2236/13 DATED 14-05- 2013 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO 3 TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR NO 1663/RAI/2013/LSGD DATED 05-02-2013 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATIONS DATED 19-02-2014 TO THE RESPONDENTS NO 2 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATIONS DATED 19-02-2014 TO THE RESPONDENTS NO 3 P. A. TO JUDGE TRUE COPY
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.