Sri Uttam Kumar Saha v. The State of Tripura and 5 Others
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2026-02-12. Sri Uttam Kumar Saha v. The State of Tripura and 5 Others. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) 86 of 2026 Sri Uttam Kumar Saha, (aged about 52 Years) S/O- Late Anil Kumar Saha, Resident of Ranirbazar, P. S. Ranirbazar, District-West Tripura, Tripura, Pin-799035, …....... Petitioner. VERSUS 1. The State of Tripura, Represented by its Secretary. Revenue Department, Government of Tripura, New Capital Complex, P. O-Kunjaban, PS- New Capital Complex, Agartala, District-West Tripura, Pin-799010. 2. The District Magistrate and Collector. West Tripura, Office at Agartala, near Office Lane, P. O-Agartala, PS- West Agartala, District- West Tripura, Pin-799001. 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jirania Sub-Division, PS- Jirania, District-West Tripura, Tripura, Pin- 799045. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Ranirbazar Municipal Council, Ranirbazar, P. S. Ranirbazar, District - West Tripura, Tripura, Pin-799035 5. The Officer-in-Charge, Ranirbazar Police Station, Ranirbazar, District West Tripura, Tripura. , Pin-799035 ………Respondents 6.
Sri Prabir Das, Vice-Chairman, Ranirbazar Municipal Council, Ranirbazar, PS- Ranirbazar, District – West Tripura, Tripura , Pin – 799035. ……….. Proforma-Respondents For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indrajit Bhomik, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. P. Gautam, Sr. G. A. HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD O R D E R 12. 02. 2026 [1] Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. [2] Mr. Indrajit Bhowmik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits before this Court that he wants to withdraw this present petition with liberty to approach before the appropriate forum. [3] Request considered. [4] Accordingly, this present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach before the competent Civil Court as well as the Criminal Court and also the competent authorities. Since, the same is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. [5] As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed. DR. T.
AMARNATH GOUD, J Paritosh Digitally signed by SABYASACSABYASACHI GHOSH Date: 2026. 02. 18 HI GHOSH 17:18:25 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.