SRI.V.SELVARAJ v. SRI.LOKESH REDDY
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: JYOTI MULIMANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-01-30. SRI.V.SELVARAJ v. SRI.LOKESH REDDY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - RFA No. 1926 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 30 DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1926 OF 2023 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. V. SELVARAJ S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RD R/AT 28, 3 CROSS, VINAYAKANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 030. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MAHENDRA GOWDA. C. R. , ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. LOKESH REDDY S/O K. SRINIVAS REDDY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO. 73, SRI. RAJESHWARI NILAYA, KAGGADASPURA MAIN ROAD, C. V. RAMAN NAGAR, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA BENGALURU-560 093. M R Location: High 2. Court of Karnataka SRI. M. NARAYANAPPA S/O MARANNA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT G. K. LAYOUT, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, SINGASANDRA POST, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560 068. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. - 2 - RFA No.
1926 of 2023 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Counsel for the appellant has appeared in person and sought time to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is plain. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again the appeal was listed on 09. 01. 2025, on that day, finally a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 30. 01. 2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’.
Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not - 3 - RFA No. 1926 of 2023 interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 09. 01. 2025, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No. : 1 Sl No. : 29
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.