SADDAM HUSSAIN @ PUTUL @ TUTUL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-22. SADDAM HUSSAIN @ PUTUL @ TUTUL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010121962020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2444/2020 SADDAM HUSSAIN @ PUTUL @ TUTUL S/O MD. CHANDMAHAMMAD ALI, R/O JANAPATH, BY LANE NO. 17, HOUSE NO. 26, P. O. KHANAPARA, PS. DISPUR, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781022 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR Z ALAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR ORDER Date : 22-12-2020 Heard Mr. N. D. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. K. Kalita, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent and Ms. S. Nazneen, learned counsel for the informant. This petition under Section 438 Cr. P. C. , is filed for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely Md. Saddam Hussain @ Putul @ Tutul, apprehending arrest Page No. # 2/2 in connection with Dispur P. S. Case No.
1879/2020 registered u/s 366(A) of the IPC. The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court. It may be mentioned that by order, dated 24. 09. 2020, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Perusal of the case diary reveals no sufficient prima facie incriminating evidence against the petitioner requiring his custodial interrogation, subject, of course, to final outcome in the investigation. Therefore, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 24. 09. 2020 is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions- (i) That the petitioner shall co-operate in investigation as and when required; (ii) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (iii) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner.
Return the case diary. This disposes off the anticipatory bail application. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.