ASHOK MANSING GAVALI BHOSALE v. VINAYAK VITTHAL GAVALI AND ANR
Court: Bombay High Court
Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2025-12-24. ASHOK MANSING GAVALI BHOSALE v. VINAYAK VITTHAL GAVALI AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA PALLAVI WARGAONKAR MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2025. 12. 24 Pallavi 17:43:23 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2016 Ashok Mansing Gavali Bhosale ... Applicant Versus Vinayak Vitthal Gavali And Anr. ... Respondents ______________________________________________________ None for Applicant. None for Respondents. ______________________________________________________ CORAM : Advait M. Sethna, J. DATED : 24 December 2025 P. C. :- 1. This Court had passed the following order on 18 December 2025:- “1. None appears for the Applicant. This Civil Revision Application pertains to the year 2016 and is pending for admission since then. 2. List these proceedings on 24 December 2025. 3.
It is made clear that if the Applicant is again not represented on the said date, it would be presumed that the Applicant is not interested in prosecuting this proceeding and appropriate orders would be passed. ” 2. The record reveals that the proceedings had appeared on earlier dates where the Applicants had sought for time and on his request, the proceedings were adjourned. The same position qua the Applicant continues. Despite the clear order dated 18 December 2025 the Applicant has not taken any steps, either to represent himself before the Court or to appear today. The Applicant has not taken the orders of this Court seriously. 3. In light of the above and the order dated 18 December 2025, this Court is constrained to dismiss the Civil Revision Application for want of prosecution as it is apparent that the Applicant has lost interest in pursuing the same. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Application is Dismissed as such. (Advait M. Sethna, J)
Source: Bombay High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.