SRI MUNGURA DURGA RAJU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2025-02-05. SRI MUNGURA DURGA RAJU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
APHC010703342022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3396] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10302/2022 Between: 1. SRI MUNGURA DURGA RAJU, S/O. LATE SOMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 26YEARS, OCC. PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O VILLAKGE OF KAIKALURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. SRI. MUNGARA SOMA RAJU, (DIED) S/O. BULLI VNKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, VADDEELU, PANDIRIPALLIGUDEM KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI. MUNGARA VENKATESWARAMMA, W/O SOMA RAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE,VADDEELU, PANDIRIPALLIGUDEM,KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI. MORU KASULU, S/O BULLI VENKANNA, AGE. 50 YEARS, VADDELU, H. NO. 1-45, NEAR MPP SCHOOL, JAYAPURAM VILLAGE, PEDAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. GHANTASALA BALA KUMARI @ KRISHNA KUMARI,, W/O GANGADHARARAO,AGE. 36 YEARS,VADDEELU, D. NO.
3-112 A, BC COLONY,CHETTUNNAPADU VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. GHANTASALA MEENA LAVANYA @ LAVANYA, W/O BALAJI AGE. 34 YEARS, VADDELU, H. NO. 1-53/A, RAMALAYAM CENTRE,KAIKALURU VILLAGE, ELURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DIST ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH S. H. O, KAIKALURU, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. MUNGARA NAGA RAMYA, W/O DURGA RAJU, AGE. 23 YEARS,VADDEELU,VADLAKUTITHIPPA VILLAGE, QIKALTIRTI MSMDAL KRISHNA NICTRIRT. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. RAVI KUMAR GADIPE Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioners. 2. The docket proceedings dated 04. 02. 2025 also show that none represented for the Petitioners. 3. Ms. K. Prasanna Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 4.
In that view, the criminal petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05. 02. 2025 Dinesh HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl. P. No. 10302 of 2022 Dt. 05. 02. 2025 Dinesh
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.