RANVEER SINGH SAINI v. STATE AND ANR
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: FARJAND ALI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-11. RANVEER SINGH SAINI v. STATE AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:8282] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 663/2018 Ranvir Singh Saini S/o Ramji Lal Saini, By Caste Mali, Resident Of House No. 9 Partap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hisar, Tehsil And District Hisar, Haryana. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Mani Ram S/o Sh. Sanwta Ram, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Village Chhani Badi, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 1437/2018 Ranveer Singh Saini S/o Ramji Lal Saini, By Caste Mali, Resident Of House No. 9 Pratap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hisar, Tehsil And District Hisar, Hariyana. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Vimala Devi W/o Subhas Chandra, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Chak Bhojasar, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. ----Respondents S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 1586/2018 Ranvir Singh Saini S/o Ramji Lal Saini, By Caste Mali, Resident Of House No.
9 Partap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hisar, Tehsil And District Hisar, Hariyana. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Sahab Ram S/o Jai Prakash, By Caste Jatt, Resident Of Chak Bhojasar, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. ----Respondents S. B. Criminal Misc(Pet. ) No. 1587/2018 Ranvir Singh Saini S/o Ramji Lal Saini, Resident Of House No. 9 Partap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hisar, Tehsil And District Hisar, Hariyana. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Gulab Singh S/o Sawat Ram, By Caste Jatt, Resident Of Chanibadi, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, Dy. G. A. Mr. Ravindra Singh Bhati, Asst. G. A. For Complainant : Mr. Praveen Vyas HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order [2025:RJ-JD:8282] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-663/2018] 11/02/2025 1.
After arguing to some extent, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant misc. petition but at the same time implores for issuance of certain directions to the learned trial Court so that he may be able to make a plea for discharge and the same can be considered appropriately. 2. The prayer seems to be genuine. 3. Accordingly, the misc. petitions are disposed of. 4. The petitioner would raise a plea of discharge before the learned trial Court on the grounds raised by him in the instant petition amongst others. In such event, the learned trial Court shall here it, consider his submissions coupled with the facts and circumstances of the case and then would pass a reasoned and speaking order as per the mandate contained under Sections 239 and 240 of the Cr. P. C. The order must reflect consideration of the submission made at the instance of the parties. 5.
Observing that the petitioner is an octogenarian and suffering from certain ailments, the learned trial court is directed to exempt him from personal appearance, allowing him to attend the court proceedings through his pleader. Unless in unavoidable circumstances, he shall not be compelled to remain present in Court. 6. The stay petitions also stand disposed of. (FARJAND ALI),J 6-9-Ashutosh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.