Skip to main content
LawSphereX

RAJVEER @ LACKY JHORAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2026-08-04. RAJVEER @ LACKY JHORAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[2026:RJ-JP:36483] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6025/2026 CNR: RJHC010450652026 | URN: CRLMB / 13372U / 2026 Rajveer @ Lacky Jhorar S/o Sushil Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Chak 5, Khr, Kara Kheda, P. s. Tibbi, Dist. Hanumangarh, Raj. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Hanumangarh ) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 04/08/2026 This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr. P. C. ) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F. I. R. No. 07/2026 registered at Police Station Rajiyasar, District Sri Ganganagar, for offences under Sections 8/21 and 25 of the NDPS Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the contraband recovered is 24.

75 gm Heroine which is below commercial quantity and same is recovered from co-accused Subhash and not from the present petitioner. It is stated that same was procured from him by Kulvinder, and both Subhash and Kulvinder have already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24. 03. 2026. So far as petitioner is not convicted in similar case. After the investigation [2026:RJ-JP:36483] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6025/2026] chargesheet has been filed. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is behind the bars since 07. 04. 2026 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. This Court has considered the facts and circumstances of the case as well as perused the material available on record. The contraband recovered is 24.

75 gm Heroine which is below commercial quantity and same is recovered from co-accused Subhash and not from the present petitioner. The same was procured from him by Kulvinder, and both Subhash and Kulvinder have already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24. 03. 2026. So far petitioner is not convicted in similar case. After the investigation, chargesheet has been filed. The petitioner is behind the bars since 07. 04. 2026. Hence, keeping in view the overall facts and circumstances of the case; conclusion of the trial of the case is likely to take time; the narcotic contraband alleged to be recovered is below commercial quantity; the prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioner fleeing away from justice, in case he is enlarged on bail; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr. P. C. ) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rajveer @ Lacky Jhorar S/o Sushil Singh arrested in [2026:RJ-JP:36483] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6025/2026] connection with FIR No. 07/2026 registered at Police Station Rajiyasar, District Sri Ganganagar, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J 23/Mayank Chouhan

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.