RUDRESHWAR SATYA MURTTY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-04-23. RUDRESHWAR SATYA MURTTY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2026:JHHC:12042 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S). No. 2318 of 2018 ---------- Rudreshwar Satya Murty, aged about 63 years, son of late Jaideo Ambastha Madhukar, resident of Shastri Nagar, P. S. Giridih (T), P. O. & Dist. Giridih. ……. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Accountant General (A&E), Jharkhand, P. O. , P. S. & Dist. Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, P. S. Giridih (T), P. O. & Dist. Giridih. 4. The Circle Officer, Jamua, P. O. & P. S. Jamua, Dist. Giridih. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. S. K. Murty, Advocate For the State : Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, SC(L&C)-III For the Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Advocate ---------- 13/ 23. 04. 2026 The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for direction upon the respondents to pay the arrears of difference of salary from 01. 04. 1997 to 14. 11. 2000 to the tune of Rs.
12,255/- along with statutory interest till the date of actual payment on account of revised scale issued by the government vide memo dated 21. 09. 2007 w. e. f. 01. 04. 1997. Further prayer has been made for direction upon the respondents to pay Rs. 1000/- due on account of less payment of gratuity amount with interest till the date of actual payment as well as Rs. 500/- security amount deposited in Saving Bank Account No. 451187/B. B. D. at the time of appointment. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though petitioner has died during the pendency of this writ application, however, till date none of his legal heirs has instructed him to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the legal heirs of the petitioner to approach the concerned authority for redressal of their grievances, if any. 3. There is no objection from the respondents. 4.
Having regard to the aforesaid, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J. ) rd 23 April, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 27. 04. 2026
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.