GOPAL KRISHNA GOUR v. UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2026-04-28. GOPAL KRISHNA GOUR v. UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 14 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 19 of 2026 Date of Decision: 28. 04. 2026 Shri Gopal Krishna Gour, S/o (L) Motilal Gour, R/o Rukmani Jewellers (P) Ltd. , Shivshakti Paradise G-66-67, Central Soine Rd. Sector-2, Central Spince, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan-302039, represented by Shri Suraj Kumar (Power of Attorney holder) S/o Shri Diwani Ram, R/o Pithoragarh, Bilai, Uttrakhand-262520 …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Union of India represented by The Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Block B, Safdarjung Airport Area, New Delhi-110003. 2. Director General (DG) Central Industrial Security Force, Block No. 13, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 3. The Chief Airport Officer, Lokpriya Gopinath Bordoloi International Airport, Guwahati, Assam-781015. 4. State of Meghalaya represented by Commissioner & Secretary, Home Police Department Government of Meghalaya 5.
The Director General of Police, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong, Meghalaya 6. The Superintendent of Police, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 7. The Officer-in-Charge, Khanapara Police Station, Ri-Bhoi District,781022. 8. Shri Pyniarlang Thabah, The Investigating Officer (I/O), Khanapara Police Station Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya … Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S. Chanda, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Debnath, CGC (For R 1-3) Mr. N. D. Chullai, AAG with Mr. J. N. Rynjah, GA (For R 5-8) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: (ORAL) 1. Mr. K. Paul, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Chanda, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ application. 2. The same is not objected by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3.
Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed, on withdrawal. JUDGE Meghalaya 28. 04. 2026 “V. Lyndem-PS”
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.