NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SMT. J. SAROJINI AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-08. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SMT. J. SAROJINI AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY M. A. C. M. A. NO: 1842 OF 2011 Appeal under Section 173 of t\/. V. Act, against the Order and decree made in I\/VOP No. 149/2009 dated 1510712010 0n the file of the court of the chairman, lVlotor Accidents Claims Tribunal lX Additional District Judge, at Kamareddy. -cum- Between: National lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. , by the lr/anager B. Laxmiraj Complex, Jawahar Road, Nizamabad. (Through Policy No. 01042349 valid from 23-1-2007 lo 221. 2008) ... APPELLANT/ 2ND RESPONDENT AND 1 Smt. J. Sarojini, W/o. Pentaiah R/o. Baswapoor Village, Bhiknoor Mandal, Nizamabad District. . RespondenU Petitioner 2. Srinivas, S/o. Satyanarayana Owner of Motor Cycle No. AP25-N 7500 R/o. C/o. Panchareddy Chinna Lingam House, Bank Colony, Yellammagutta, Nizamabad District. ... RESPONDENT/ 1ST RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SMT. W. V.
S. RAJESWARI, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1 : SRI V. TULASI REDDY, Advocate The Court delivered the following. JUDGIVENT Kj THE HON'BLE SRI ]USTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY MACMA,No. 1842 of 2011 ]UDGMENT: The subject matter in the appeal was referred to Lok Adalat for settlement and accordingly, an award was passed on 05. 12. 2014 in terms of settlement. However, the award of the Lok Adalat shows that the settlement was arrived in [4ACMA. No. 1842 of 2009 , inadvertently, instead of MAClvlA. No. 1842 of 2017. As such MACI'IA. No. 1842 of 2OO9 was disposed of by the High Court. 2. Sri A. Gangaratnam, Advocate, Nizamabad, addressed a letter dated 21. 10. 2019 to the Secretary, Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, seeking rectification of mistake in the award of the Lok Adalat i. e. to record the compromise in N4ACMA. No. 1842 0f 2071 instead of MACMA. No. 1842 0f 2009. 3.
Pursuant to the said letter, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, vide proceedings dated 26. L7. 2020 informed the Registrar (Judicial), High Court for the state of Teiangana, that in the award dated 05. 12. 2014, I\4ACMA. No. 1824 of 2009 was corrected as l4ACl4A. No. 1842 of 2011 by one of the Lok Adalat Members, as it was typographical mistake and requested to record the Lok Adalat award in lvlAcl4A. No. 1842 of 2017 (OP. No. 149 of 2009 ) . In view of the above, the civil miscellaneous appeal is closed in terms of the award, dated 05. 12. 2014, passed by the Lok Adalat. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. K. SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGI RAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal lX Additional District and Sessions -cum- Judge, at Kamareddy. (with records, if any) 2. One CC to Smt W. V. S. Rajeswari, Advocate (OPUC) 3. One CC to Sri V. Tulasi Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 4.
Two CD Copies \ (r,onn with a copy of the award) \. ,r, ;f:-: HIGH COURT DATED:0811212020 JUDGMENT '. t-:i? MACMA. No. 1842 of 2011 lo 17 DECZWT p * -. 1 t ,t CLOSING THE APPEAL IN TERMS OF THE AWARD. . >a \k \' BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD AT HYDERABAD IOrganized by Hlgh Court legol Services Commlttee Hlgh Court ol Judlcolure ol Hyderobod , For ihe Slole ol Telqngqno ond lhe Slole ol Andhro Prodesh i Under Seclion l9 of lhe Legol Services Aulhorilies Act, 1987 {Cenr/ql Acl)l MACMA No. r842 o{bOo zru t I (Belore Hon'ble Hlgh Court) (Agolnst Order ln M. V. O. P. No. l49l 2009 on lhe llle ol lhe Molor Accldenls Clolms Tribunot-cum-lX Addltlonol Dlshlcl & Sesslons Judge, Komoreddy) Appellonl/ Respondenl No. 2 Nolionol lnsuronce Compony Limited, Chennoi, rep. by its Bronch monoger. Bronch Of fice. B. Loxmiroj Complex, Jowohor Rood, Nizomobod (through policy No. 01042349 volid from 23. 01 . 2007 to 22. 0I . 2008) Respondenl/ pelilioner Smt. J. Sojojini. W/o.
Pentoioh, oged 60 yeors, Hindu, Mudiro. j, Occ: Agriculture & Beedi roller, R/o. Boswopoor Villoge, Bhiknoor Mondol, Nizomobod Districl. Respondenl/ Respondenl No. i 2 Srinivos, S/o. So'tyonoroyono, oged mojor, coste, Hindu, Owner of molor cycle beoring No. AP 25 N 7500, R/o. C/o. Ponchoreddy Chinno Lingom House, Bonk Colony, Yellommogullo, Nizomobod. [No. of proceedings of lhe High Couri Legol Services Commiliee: ORDER Roc. No. 2954lHCLSC/2O1 4 Di. 28-l l-201 4l :: Presenl :: Nome of Choirmon : Hon'ble Sri Juslice C. V. Romulu, Judge. Hlgh Courl of A. P. (Reld. ), Nome of Member : I ) Sri Ch. Nogesworo Roo, Advocole, Bor Associolion, Hyderobod. (2) Smt. G. Niveditho, Advocole & Sociol work€r, Hyderobod. AWARD The dispute belween the porties hoving been referred for delerminotion to the 'the LOK ADALAT ond the porlies hoving compromised cose / motter, lhe following Aword is possed in lerms of the seltlement: l. Sri. K.
Soi Prokosh, Depuly Monoger, Notionol lnsuronce Compony Limited ond Sri S. Srinivos, leorned counsel for respondeni/ petilioner ore present. The moller hos been sellled omicobly between ihe porties. 2. The respondeni/ peiiiioner ogreed 1o receive reduced compensolion omount of Rs. 3,00. 000/- wi'lh inleresl ot 75% per onnum from lhe dole of petition till the dote of reolizotion ogoinsl lhe oworded omount of Rs. 3,26,200/- with inlerest ol 7. 5% per onnum. 3. The Insuronce compony is io deposit on omounl of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees 'fhe three lokhs only) with interest ol 7. 5% per onnum from dote of petilion till the dole of reolisotion, within o period of two (2) mon'ths from the dote of receipl of o copy of ihis oword ofler giving due credil 1o the omount olreody deposiled. ln the evenl of defoull, the ogreed omouni sholl corry interes'l ol 12% per onnum from ihe doie of defoult.
4 The respondent/ pelilioner is permilled to wilhdrow the omouni os oncl i when deposiled by lhe lnsuronce compony. tlks#+t- " 5. The polties ore informed thot the courl fee, if ony, poid by ony of them sholl be'efur-ded. 6. No orders os 1o the costs of oppeol ,tj )l',';,)ilri Insurance Co. Ltd (trro,1 (asry ) Deputy 1"4 ani0e Appellont/ respondenl No. 2 Respondenl/ pelilioner tt. '' 1il3,14 \ p^,* J kt*-k -i Counsel for Appellonl/ Counselfor Respondenl/ respondent No. 2 pelitioner u . Th'/1,//1 ,/,2 xt [,rr(i''1c''a G Ch nn{^L", Member oore: O$ *L" il::'" -lZ_ 1q r. :,i1,: u;i L ti,i "0 x, at,, ii]rt;" mittee) TO Ii 4,,/ -? r. \J "\; *;.. *- I llit h C,:,': t i.. Hiuh (:; r,. t ,:l for iir-. ii. le ,. ; j. iu . tir. i titr: Stari li ;i;rlir:a P, a,iesh Uigh Cou,1 IJuliiiii,! s. tlrduabaC-j00 00u. r'l
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.