Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-09-15. Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 54809 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -600 Year-2021 Thana- KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE District- Khagaria ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar S/O Rajendra Prasad Singh R/O Village- Gokhul Nagar, Bishnupur, Sadipur Diara, P. S- Balia, Distt. - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rupam Kumari @ Rupam Singh W/O Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar S/O Rajendra Prasad Singh, R/O Village- Rajdham, P. S- Maheshkhunt, Distt. - Khagaria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh- A. P. P. Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 15-09-2025 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls. 2. Learned A. P. P.
and the learned counsel for the complainant are present. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 submits that the case was taken up on 01. 09. 2025, when the petitioner has sought a week’s time for removing the defects as pointed out by the office. Further, it was also submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the dispute is matrimonial and the petitioner is the husband, as such, the Court had granted interim protection. It is submitted that till date, the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 54809 of 2025(3) dt. 15-09-2025 2/2 defects as pointed out by the office has not been removed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the petitioner is enjoying the interim protection. 4. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, as such, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.