Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Court: Patna High Court

Bench: MR. JUSTICE R. P. MISHRA

Judgment date:

Case summary

Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-11-27. Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 81634 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -248 Year-2025 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Kumar Son of Shri Upendra Shah Resident of Village- Hirdopatti, P. S. - Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P. S. Case No. 248 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 803. 13 liters of Nepali liquor was recovered from Bolero Vehicle, Alto vehicle and courtyard. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 81634 of 2025(2) dt. 27-11-2025 2/2 no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is neither owner nor driver of the seized vehicles in question. It is also submitted that Mahal Chowkidar disclosed the name of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 12. 11. 2025 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Runnisaidpur P. S. Case No. 248 of 2025. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) krishnakant/- U T

Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.