Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Smt. N. Bharathamma v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: E.V. VENUGOPAL

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-09. Smt. N. Bharathamma v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 32ee ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 662 OF 2026 Between: Smt. N. Bharathamma, W/o. Late Rama Krishna Goud, Aged about. 65 years, Occ. HouseWife, R/o. Gokafasalwad Village, Doulthabad Mandal, Vikarabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 50OO22. 2. The District Collector, Vikarabad,Vikarabad District -501101. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tandur , Vikarabad District-S01 141 . 4. The Tahsildar, Doulthabad Mandal, Vikarabad, 509336: 5. Smt. Nandaram Pushpalatha, Wo. N. Venkataiah, Aged about. 45 Years, Occ. Household, Rl/o. Gokafasalwad Village, Doulthabad Mandal, Vikarabad. 509336. 6. Kongara Ramulu, S/o. Bandeppa, Aged about. 47 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R|/o. Gokafasalwad Village, Doulthabad Mandal, Vikarabad.

509336. ... RESPONDENTS . Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in not taking any effective steps on my representation and on my F-line application dated. 1611212025, vide lD. No. VKBDElEl2025l00039 done under the Bhu Bharathi Portal, wherein I requested them to do mutation the subject land in my favour, uploading the same in Bhu Bharthi Portal and not issuing Patta Pass Book in spite of my application to 3rd Respondent on 2711012025 is Challenged in this Writ Petition as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Art. 14, 1 I (1 (g), ) 21 and 30C-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the Respondents to take immediate steps to mutate my name and issue patta pass Book in resp,=ct of the Survey No.

221e, ext€nt. Ac. 0-14 gts, survey No. 273le, extent. Ac. 0-23 gts, Survey No. 273le, extent. Ac. 0-23 gts, survey No. 2g9le, extent. Ac. 1-i,7 gts, Survey No. 290, extent. Ac. 0-35 gts and total extent Ac. 2-2g gts, Situated at Gokafasalwad Village, Doulthabad tMandal, Vikarabad District. lA NO: 1 oF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavil filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Un-,lfficial Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 not to interfere in my possession over the land in assign any portion of the land in the Survey Nos. 221e, extent Ac. 0-14 gts, Survey No. 273le, extent. Ac. O-23 gts, Survey No. 2731e, extentAc. 0- 23 gts, surverr No. 289/e, extent Ac. 1-37 gts, survey No. 290, extent Ac. 0-35 gts and total e'xtent Ac. 2-29 gts, Situated at Gokafasalwad Village, Doulthabad [/andal, vikarurbad, pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIVENKATATAH EDIGA counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 4: sRt L. RAVINDER, AGp FoR REVENUE, REP. GP FOR REVENUE The Coirrt made the following: ORDER tr\ ! I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No. 662 of 2o26 Dated: O9. O1 . 2O26 Between: Smt N. Bharathamma Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretar5r, Revenue Department. and five others ... Respondents ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of ionstitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- '... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 & 4 in not taking any effective steps on my representation and F-line application dated. L6-L2-2O25, vide ID. No.

VKBDElDl2025/00039 done under the Bhu Bharathi Portal, wherein I requested them to do mutation the subject land in my favour, uploading the same in Bhu Bharthi Portal and not issuing Patta Pass Book in spite of my application to 3rd Respondent on 27-LO-2A25 is challenged in this Writ Petition as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Att- 14, 19(1X9), 2L & 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to take immediate steps to mutate my name and issue Patta Pass Book in respect of the Survey No. 221e, extent: Ac. 0-14 gts, Survey No. Z731e, extent: Ac. O-23 gts, Survey No. 273le, extent: Ac. 0-23 gts, Survey No. 289/e, extent: Ac. 1-37 gts, Survey No. 290, extent: Ac. O-35 gts and total extent: Ac. 2-29 gfs, . , r. ,]]] situated at Gokafasalwad Village, Doulthabad Mandal, Vikarabad District and pass such other suitable order or orders... " 2. t{eard Mr. E. Venkataiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.

Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Re,renue appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Perused the record 3. \Vhen the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counst:l for the petitioner seeks a direction to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to pass appropriate orders on the on-line applictrtion through Prajavani bearing No. 586581 dated L6. 12. 2025 vide ID. No. VKBDE/E submitted by l2025100039 [he pe:itioner seeking to mutate the narne of the petitioner in respecl of lands admeasuring Ac. O- 14 gts in survey No. 22l /e, Ac. O-23 gts in survey No. 273 e, Ac. 1-37 gts in f Sy No. 289/e, Ac. O-35 gts in Sy. No. 29O situated at Gokafasalwad Village, Doulthabad Mandal, Vikarabad District and to pass approp,riate orders. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submil. s that appropriate orders would be passed in due course of time J (l 5.

Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel, on considering the material available on record and 1 taking note of the fact that the petitioner has already \ T t submitted a representation dated 2. 7. 10. 2025 before I respondent No. 3, this Court, without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to direct respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to examine the representation dated 27. IO. 2025 along with the on-line application dated L6. 12. 2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of (90) working days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, by putting the interested parties on notice and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing. Since, notice is already directed on respondent Nos. S and 6 further service of notice on respondent Nos.

5 and 6 stands dispensed with 6 With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (i Ivliscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed D/. P. PONNA KRISHNA TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/ ECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, S at, Hyderabad, State of Telangana-500022. 2 The District Collector, Vikarabad, Vikarabad District -501101. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tandur, Vikarabad District-S01141. 4 The Terhsildar, Doulthabad tVandal, Vikarabad, 509336. 5 One CC to SRI VENKATAIAH EDIGA, Advocate IOPUC] 6 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderzrbad [OUT] 7 Two CD Copies BSR GJP fk , HIGH COURT DATED: 09/0112026 1 ORDER o 2 t Jr}l 20? 0 WP. No. 6;62 of 2026 . \ + ,a q:i-', - (' POSI NG OF TH E-WRIT+ET_ITION , WITHOUT COSTS 6ra \o W- 55t*

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.