D. Ramchander v. Dr. B. Janardhan Reddy, IAS
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-31. D. Ramchander v. Dr. B. Janardhan Reddy, IAS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDER,ABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI CONTE M PT CASE N :1540 F 1 contempt case under sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for wilfully violating the order of the High court dated 24t07/2o1g passed in W. P. No. 15537 of 2019 Between: D. Ramchander, S/o Buogaiatr, aged about 50 years, occ- Junior stenographer O/o. Directorate of Jawahar-6at puutic ahav;n c*d";;, Ni;r;;itv, ri'vi! r. E'ii. '"r'' .. ,PETITIONER AND '1. Dr. B. Janard[an Reddy, lAS, Secretary to Government, School Educatjon uepanment 4' flogr, BRKR Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. ^ sri Hanumanthu. Pav And Accounts officer, Telangana state lnsurance Building, Abids, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NO. 1 & 4 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D. RAMAKRISHNA Counsel forthe Respondent No.
1 : Gp FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : Gp FOR SERVICES-I The Court made the following: ORDER SHAVILI KUMAR ABHINAND SRl JUSTICE HON'BLE of 2019 C. C. No. 1540 ORDER disobedience wilful comPlaining case is iile<l This contemPt dated the order in implementing the respondents part of ofl the of 2019. by this Court in W'P'No'15537 24. 01 . z[lgpassed learned for hearrng, uP is taken rwhen the matter resPondents for the appearing Services-I Ple ader for Government passed by dated24'01 '2019 order of the that in ' reported Pursuance have ondents the resp of 2019' rn W. P. No. 15537 this Court rT de proceedings and reiected Petitioner the case of the considered . 72'2020 ' dated 29 not does for the Petitioner aPPearlng counsel Learned the same' dispute flowever' crosed. case is same, the contempt rn view of the the teiection to challenge to the is gven Petitioner libertY with law' in accordance dated 29.
12'2020' proceedings shall stand closed' if any' pending petitions' Miscellaneous t'ltt"r? f -"3'$EXA Ap i //TRUE coPY// I OFFICER SECTION To lEi'3m*ru',ri,'*ni:$:ne:Hi:f+ia'"#'"TaH::::::Tl'ong iiTsi]'1ffi:i'"n't33y'? 1"'thestateorrerangana ? QIIi"ilH3'[111'f at tSBIl' the State of relansana' Hish court for +#""*' ^'' (OUT) 'u*'""s-l' Hvderabad 6. Two CD CoPies Ki. r\\nx HIGH GOURT t1212020 DATED:31 ST4 1 r-t re o 2021 o 2I JAN fr 't{ ! . ^-i ORDER of 2019 CC. No. 1540 Closing the GONTEPT CAs€ ? *p
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.