BHAGIRATHI LOHAR v. NORTHERN COAL FIELD LIMITED
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-03. BHAGIRATHI LOHAR v. NORTHERN COAL FIELD LIMITED. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL rd ON THE 3 OF JANUARY, 2024 MISC. APPEAL No. 5635 of 2022 BETWEEN:- BHAGIRATHI LOHAR S/O SHRI HANSHU LOHAR, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE NAVA NAGAR POLICE STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (NONE ) AND 1. NORTHERN COAL FIELD LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER NIGAHI PROJECT DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. BINDA DEVI W/O AWADH BIHARI SINGH VILLAGE NAVA NAGAR POLICE STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. RAJNATH VISHWAKARMA S/O LATE SHRI DADU VISHWAKARMA VILLAGE NAVA NAGAR POLICE STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. LALAN VISHWAKARMA S/O LATE SHRI DADU VISHWAKARMA VILLAGE NAVA NAGAR POLICE STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. SHITAL VISHWAKARMA S/O LATE SHRI DADU VISHWAKARMA VILLAGE NAVA NAGAR POLICE STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. SMT.
AKBARI W/O LATE KEDARNATH STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: VAISHALI Signing time: 1/5/2024 9:51:02 AM 7. VIYALAL VISHWAKARMA S/O LATE KEDARNATH STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) 8. CHHOTELAL VISHWAKARMA S/O LATE KEDARNATH VISHWAKARMA VILLAGE NAVA NAGAR POLICE STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) 9. RUKUN DEVI W/O LATE DANBAHADUR VISHWAKARMA VILLAGE NAVA NAGAR POLICE STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) 10. RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE KEDARNATH VISHWAKARMA VILLAGE NAVA NAGAR POLICE STATION WAIDHAN DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (NONE) T h is appeal coming on for order this day, t h e cou rt passed the following: ORDER Perus al of the order-sheets reveals that on previous date i. e. on 05. 12. 2023 no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Today also, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant.
I t appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. Therefore, present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. (ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL) JUDGE vai Signature Not Verified Signed by: VAISHALI Signing time: 1/5/2024 9:51:02 AM
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.