J. Kondala Rao, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-14. J. Kondala Rao, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI I WRIT PETITION NO: 34983 OF 2012 Between: 1. J. Kondala Rao, Son of Sri J. Lakshman Rao, Aged 50 years, Occupation: Service, Resident of South Indian Bank Ltd, Hyderabad I RO, Floor, CHAI Complex, 157, Staff Road, Gun Rock Enclave, Sikh Village, Secunderabad-9. 2. Mrs. D. Hema Latha, Wife of D. Srinivasa Rao, Aged 62 years. Occupation; Retired, Resident of C/o. A. Prasanna Kumar, 7/8, Adarsh Nagar, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam. 3. Mrs. R. Vinodhini, Wife of R. Varahalu Aged 63 years. Occupation: House wife. Resident of Sunset Kunj, Kalkaji, New Delhi - 110 019. 4. DVLN Raju, Son of D. V. Subba Raju, Aged 67 years. Occupation: Retired, Resident of 79-8-612, Near Donbosco School, Postal Colony, Rajahmundry. 5. J. Mani Kumar, Son of J Seetharamaiah, Aged 45 years.
Occupation; Service, Resident of C/o. K. Sitaram Prasad, 50-47-4, 1®* Floor, PNT Colony, Sitammadhara, Visakhapatnam. 6. Mrs. G. Gouri Mahalakshmi, Wife of G. Surya Satyanarayana, Aged 64 years, Occupation; Retired, Resident of C/o. Dr. G. Srinivas, Seven hills Hospital, Asilametta, Visakhapatnam. 7. E. Venkat Reddy, Son of Sri E. Narasimha Swamy, Aged 65 years. Occupation: Retired, Resident of 2-27-32, Mardi, BHPV, Visakhapatnam - 12. 8. Mrs. Prem Swaroop, Wife of T. Jaganadha Rao, Aged 61 years, f - Occupation: House wife, Resident of MIG 130, Door No. 50-116-8, N t . . ''Ext. Sitammadhara, Visakhapatnam-530 013. ', 9. Mrs. T. Rajya Lakshmi, Wife of T V K Appa Rao, Aged 60 years. Resident of Sais Dream Castle, Nizampet Road, Kukatpally, Hyderabad -72. \ 10. I. Vijaya Kumar, Son of I S V B Prasad Rao, Aged 53 years. Occupation: Service, Resident of Door No. 50-42-3, P & T colony, Sitammadhara, Visakhapatnam-13. 11. A. S. Chakravathy, Son of A. Rama Murthy garu. Aged 70 years.
Occupation: Retired, Resident of 4-45-1, Ashok House, Pedda Waltair, Visakhapatnam. 12. Mrs. R. Radha Bai, Wife of R. M. Krishna, Aged 63 years. Occupation: House wife. Resident of C/o. R. Murali Krishna, 10-4-71/1/A/I, Sri Nagar Colony, Masabtank, Hyderabad - 500 028. 13. Mrs. N. Annapurna, Wife of Sri N. Rama Rao, Aged: Major, Resident of C/o. R. Murali Krishna, 10-4-71/1/A/I, Sri Nagar Colony, Hyderabad - 500 028. Resident of 14. Mr. K. Narasamma, Aged 62 years. Occupation: Retired, C/o. Savitri, 10-7-22, Besides Raghu College, Ramnagar, Visakhapatnam. 15. Mrs. R. Bhanu Vyjayanti, Wife of R. R. Kumar, Aged 65 years. Occupation: House wife. Resident of C/o. Dr. R. R. Kumar, Plot 916, Road No. 46, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 16. Kothi Seetharama Prasad, S/o. Sri K. Siva Sarma, Aged 64 years. Occupation: Retired, Resident of Visakhapatnam. All the petitioners are represented by their Authorised person Sri S. Sitapati Rao, S/o. Ramamurthy, Aged 72 years.
Occupation: Retired, Resident of Plot No. 117, Flat No. 302, Ashray Elegant, Road No. 3, Street No. 7, West Marredpally, Secunderabad-26. ... Petitioner/s AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 3. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority (VUDA), Represented by its Vice-Chairman, Visakhapatnam. ... Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may direction more be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or declaring the inaction of particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus in respect of the respondents in not paying compensation to the petitioners District, their plots situate in Sy. No.
110, Madhurawada Visakhapatnam alternative to grant which were deprived of by the respondents, or in the violative of Articles 14 and sites to the petitioners, as being illegal, arbitrary, 300-A of the Constitution of India I. A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 47256 OF 2015) circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be Petition being W. P. No. pleased to expedite the hearing of the instant Writ 34983 of 2012 by fixing an early date. I. A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 24777 OF 2013) circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be auction in respect of pleased to direct the respondents not to conduct any the land in Sy. No. 110 or any part thereof of Madhurawada, Visakhapatham District. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. V PREETI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent nos.
1 and 2; GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: f IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No. 34983 of 2012 J. Kondala Rao, S/o Sri J. Lakshman Rao, aged 50 years, Occupation: Service, Resident of South Indian Bank Ltd. , Hyderabad RO, 1®*^ Floor, CHAI Complex, 157, Staff Road, Gun Rock Enclave, Sikh Village, Secunderabad - 9 and 15 others. (All the petitioners are represented by their authorized person, Sri S. Sitapati Rao, s/o Ramamurthy, aged 72 years. Occupation : Retired, Resident of Plot No. 117, Flat No. 302, Ashray Elegant, Road No. 3, Street No. 7, West Marredpally, Secunderabad - 26. ) ... Petitioners Versus The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others. ... Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri V. Preethi Reddy, learned counsel : GP for Revenue and Sri V.
Counsel for respondents Suiya Kiran Kumar, standing counsel ORDER :: no This writ petition is of the year, 2012. As there was and representation on behalf of the petitioners on 24. 01. 2024 -4 under the 07. 02. 2024, the matter was directed to be listed today caption ‘for dismissal’. ‘for Today, though the matter is listed under the caption either in dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners the forenoon or in the afternoon. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. shall As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand dismissed. SD/- P. VINOD KUMAR //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT^^aSTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1. OneCCto SRI. V PREETI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT 3. Two CD Copies. PSD \ HIGH COURT DATED:14/02/2024 ORDER Of ;/x: 1 1 2 AUG 2m HO . Current Section WP. No.
34983 of 2012 DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS ^
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.