P.MANIKANDAN v. THE CHAIRMAN
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2024-12-19. P.MANIKANDAN v. THE CHAIRMAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
W. P. No. 35060 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19. 12. 2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W. P. No. 35060 of 2013 and M. P. Nos. 2 & 3 of 2013 P. Manikandan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai Head Office, Chennai. 2. The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Central Zone, Chennai. 3. The Executive Engineer /O & M, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, T. Nagar. 4. The Supertending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Valluvarkottam, Chennai – 34. ... Respondents PRAYER: The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relevant to the order F/M/vz;/121-013-epgp2-c1-nfh/t/c/g/c- nd 2010-3 dated 11. 11. 2013 passed by 2 respondent and quash the same as https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 1/4 W. P. No.
35060 of 2013 illegal, improper, against the rule of law and principles of natural justice and nd thereby direction the 2 respondent to include the petitioner's name in the panel for the post of Line Man in F/M/vz;/121-013/epgp2-c1-nfh/t/c/g/c- 2010? 3 dated 11. 11. 2013 and promote the petitioner as Line Man in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board of Chennai. Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr. David Sundar Singh Standing counsel ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the order of the second respondent dated 11. 11. 2013 and for consequential direction to include the petitioner's name in the panel for the post of Lineman and to promote him. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the petitioner had already retired from service on 31. 01. 2017 and all his benefits have been settled in the category of Senior Grade Wireman. https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 2/4 W. P. No. 35060 of 2013 3.
When the writ petition was listed for hearing on 06. 12. 2024 and also on 17. 12. 2024, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition was directed to be listed today i. e. 19. 12. 2024 under the caption “for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes/No 19. 12. 2024 Internet:Yes/No sms To 1. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai Head Office, Chennai. 2. The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Central Zone, Chennai. 3. The Executive Engineer /O & M, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, T. Nagar. 4. The Supertending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Valluvarkottam, Chennai – 34. https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 3/4 W. P. No. 35060 of 2013 G. ARUL MURUGAN,J. sms W. P. No. 35060 of 2013 and M. P. Nos. 2 & 3 of 2013 19. 12. 2024 https://www. mhc.
tn. gov. in/judis 4/4
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.