PRAMILA SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-12-24. PRAMILA SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W. P. (C) No. 35585 of 2025 Pramila Sahoo …. Petitioner Represented By Adv. Mr. Kousik Ananda Guru -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Represented By AGA Mr. Bibekananda Nayak CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER Order 24. 12. 2025 No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction from this Court to the Opposite Parties not to evict the Petitioner from his place i. e. Plot No. 24/2, Ward No. 7, RAY-104/A, Srikrushna Nagar Basti, Sailashree Vihar, Bhubaneswar. 3. Heard. 4. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that before approaching this Court, the Petitioner has already ventilated his grievance before the Opposite Party No. 1/the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, // 2 // Urban and Housing Development Department, Odisha, Bhubaneswar vide Annexures-5 and 6 by way of representation dated 12. 09. 2023 and 15. 10. 2025.
He further submits that the said grievance of the Petitioner is still pending. 5. He, accordingly, prays that a direction may be issued to the Opposite Party No. 1/the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Urban and Housing Development Department, Odisha, Bhubaneswar for considering the said grievance of the Petitioner. 6. Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the Petitioner is directed approach the Opposite Party No. 1/the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Urban and Housing Development Department, Odisha, Bhubaneswar along with a copy of this order within a period of one week from the date of presentation of an authenticated copy of this order. The Opposite Party No. 1/the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Urban and Housing Development Department, Odisha, Bhubaneswar shall dispose of the representation within a period of fifteen days thereafter. // 3 // 7.
As an interim measure, it is directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the present Petitioner till the disposal of the representation under Annexures-5 and 6. 8. It is made clear that the concerned authority is free to take steps after disposal of the representation as per law. 9. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Sumitra Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMITRA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 24-Dec-2025 17:42:57
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.