SIDDHI ENTERPRISES THR ITS CHAIRPERSON v. NASHIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS
Court: Bombay High Court
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Judgment date:
Case summary
Bombay High Court judgment dated 2025-12-09. SIDDHI ENTERPRISES THR ITS CHAIRPERSON v. NASHIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS....
Judgment text
Rekha Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6885 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2325 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6885 OF 2022 Shri Bhagur Parisar Mahila Udyog Sahakari …Petitioners Sanstha Limited Through Chaiperson Versus Nashik Municipal Corporation …Respondents Through Municipal Commissioner And Ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6891 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6886 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6888 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6887 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6889 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6890 OF 2022 Ms. Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate with Sangram Chinnappa, for the Petitioners. Mr. Subhash V. Gutte, for the Respondent-Corporation in WP/6885/2022, WP/6886/2022, WP/6887/2022, WP/6888/2022, WP/6889/2022, WP/6890/2022 & WP/6891/2022. Mr. Sachin S. Gite a/w Sarfaraj J. Shaikh, for the Respondent Nos. 18 & 19. Mr. Rahul Motkari a/w Manasi Pawar, for the Respondent No. 22 in IA/2325/2023 in WP/6885/2022. Ms.
Sayali S. Gutte, for the Respondents in IA/2325/2023. REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Page 1 of 3 Date: 2025. 12. 10 th 10:57:36 +0530 9 December, 2025 Ms. Neha Bhide, GP with Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. G. P. , with Ms. Rupali Shinde, AGP, for the Respondent-State, in WP/6886/2022, WP/6888/2022. Ms. Neha Bhide, GP with Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. G. P. , with Ms. Reena Salunkhe, AGP, for the Respondent-State, in WP/6885/2022, WP/6890/2022, WP/6891/2022, WP/6887/2022. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & S. M. MODAK, JJ. th DATED: 9 DECEMBER, 2025. PC:- 1. Ms. Gayatri Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioners / Applicant in this batch of Writ Petitions, submits that when the proceedings were initiated, at that time, the Petitioners were aggrieved by the Clauses in the EOI as well as the manner of the implementation of the EOI. However, as on date, the period of the contract has already expired. 2.
She submits, that although, the contract period has expired, yet, Petitioners desire to pursue the allegation of malpractices in the award of the contract. As such, she seeks leave of this Court to withdraw these proceedings with liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as may be permissible under the law, including lodging complaint before the State’s Vigilance Department. Prayer is allowed. The Writ Petitions are permitted to be withdrawn. 3. We make it clear that if bonafide complaint is lodged by the Petitioners before the Competent Authority, the same be considered in accordance with law. th 9 December, 2025 4. All the Writ Petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn. 5. In view of disposal of the Writ Petitions, Interim Application(s) also stand disposed of. (S. M. MODAK, J. ) (SUMAN SHYAM, J. ) { th 9 December, 2025
Source: Bombay High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.