P.G. JOSEPH v. P.G. GEORGEKUTTY
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2025-04-10. P.G. JOSEPH v. P.G. GEORGEKUTTY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2025:KER:31329 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. ABDUL HAKHIM TH THURSDAY, THE 10 DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RSA NO. 30 OF 2018 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DATED 10. 06. 2015 IN AS NO. 1 OF 2011 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 24. 11. 2010 IN OS NO. 290 OF 2005 OF MUSNIFF COURT,ADOOR APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: P. G. JOSEPH S/O. GEEVARGHESE MUTHALALI, RESIDING AT THEKKEVEETTIL BUNGLOW,KANNAMKODU MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI. K. S. BHARATHAN SMT. TINA ALEX THOMAS RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 7: 1 P. G. GEORGEKUTTY S/O. GEEVARGHESE MUTHALALI, RESIDING AT THEKKEVEETTIL BUNGLOW, KANNAMKODU MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PIN-628345. 2 THRESYAMMA D/O. THANKAMMA, RESIDING AT MURIKKINAL VEEDU, KADAPRA MURI, NIRANAM VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PIN-689621. 2025:KER:31329 RSA NO.
30 OF 2018 2 3 SUNNY RESIDING AT MANGATTETHU VEEDU, PONGALADI MURI,PANDALAM THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, PIN-691525. 4 SANDRA SUNNY D/O. SUNNY, MANGATTETHU VEEDU, PONGALADI MURI,PANDALAM THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN SUNNY, MANGATTETHU VEEDU, PONGALADI MURI,PANDALAM THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, PIN-691525. 5 GRACY KOSHY W/O. LATE KOSHY MUTHALALI, RESIDING AT PUTHENPARAMBIL VEEDU, KANNAMKODE MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PIN-628345. 6 SAJI P. KOSHY D/O. LATE KOSHY MUTHALALI,RESIDING AT PUTHENPARAMBIL VEEDU, KANNAMKODE MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PIN-628345. 7 SUNI P. KOSHY D/O. LATE KOSHY MUTHALALI,RESIDING AT PUTHENPARAMBIL VEEDU, KANNAMKODE MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE, PIN-628345. BY ADVS. FOR R1 & R4 SMT. ANNIE M. ABRAHAM SRI. T. K. BIJU MANJINIKARA SRI. BIJU C. VARUGHESE SMT. BINDU N. RAJAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10. 04. 2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:31329 RSA NO. 30 OF 2018 3 JUDGMENT 1.
In spite of the repeated orders from this Court to take steps against R7, it is seen that appellant has not taken steps. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- M. A. ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE sms
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.