M/S.EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK v. SHRI SHYAM FABRICS & SAREES
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2020-07-09. M/S.EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK v. SHRI SHYAM FABRICS & SAREES. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
A. No. 3519 of 2018 in A. No. 4243 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09. 07. 2020 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Application No. 3519 of 2018 in Application No. 4243 of 2017 M/s. Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd. , By its Manager Legal, Sornaraj, S/o. Sundararaj, Having its registered office at F-39, Spencer Plaza, No. 769, 4th Floor, Phase-II, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. ... Applicant versus 1. Shri Shyam Fabrics & Sarees, Rep. by its Proprietor Anand Sharaff, Navajeevan Plaza LG-24, Ground Floor, M. I. Road, Sarogi Mension, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302 003. Also at No. 53 A, Shanker Nagar, Kagadivada Amer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302 002. 2. Anand Sharaff, S/o. Rameshwar Prasad Saraff, No. 53 A, Shanker Nagar, Kagadivada Amer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302 002. 1/5 A. No. 3519 of 2018 in A. No. 4243 of 2017 3. Anchal Saraff, W/o. Anand Sharaff, No. 53 A, Shanker Nagar, Kagadivada Amer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302 002. ...
Respondents Prayer: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9(II)(b)&(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to permit the applicant to amend the boundary as described in the Judges summons in Application No. 4243 of 2017 by incorporating in the schedule 60 feet instead of 08 feet (North to South) morefully described in the Judges summons by transmitting the order to the District Court, Jaipur. For Applicant : Mr. N. K. Vanan For Respondents : No Appearance O R D E R This application has been filed by the applicant seeking to amend the boundary as described in the Judges Summons in Application No. 4243 of 2017 by incorporating in the schedule 60 feet instead of 08 feet (North to South) morefully described in the Judges summons by transmitting the order to the District Court, Jaipur. 2. Despite notice served and the respondents names have been printed in the cause list, non appeared for them. 2/5 A. No. 3519 of 2018 in A. No.
4243 of 2017 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the amendment is only with regard to the boundary, as the attachment order has already been passed by this Court in Application No. 4243 of 2017 dated 22. 09. 2017. 4. This application is ordered as prayed for. 5. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the boundary as described in Judges Summons in Application No. 4243 of 2017 and issue a fresh copy of the order. 6. Post the main Application No. 4243 of 2017 after one month. 09. 07. 2020 Speaking Order / Non-speaking Order Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes sri 3/5 A. No. 3519 of 2018 in A. No. 4243 of 2017 4/5 A. No. 3519 of 2018 in A. No. 4243 of 2017 N. SATHISH KUMAR, J. sri Application No. 3519 of 2018 in Application No. 4243 of 2017 09. 07. 2020 5/5
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.