MVV Hari Prasad v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: E.V. VENUGOPAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-11. MVV Hari Prasad v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 329S ] ! N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 30265 OF 2025 il MW Hari Prasad, S/o M Satyanaruyana, Aged about 52 years, Occupation: Business R/o H. No. 8-6-1 3413111 FCI Colony Phase ll Vanasthalipuram Hyderabad Rep. by his GPA holders Smt Anam Madhavi'Wo Anam Pattabhi Reddy, Acied about years, Occupation: Business, Fl/o H. No 8-382 Allwyn Colony !! Miyaplr -about Hyderabad 500 049, Smt Gade Prasanna Wo Gade Basivi Reddy, Aged 41 years, Occupation:. House Hold R/o H. No. 3-12-117110 Flat No. 303 Uppat PS Colony Amberp_et Hyderabad, Kari Ashok Reddy S/o Kari Venkat Reddy, Aged about 36 years, Occupation: Business, R/o 3-55/2 Mogalai Kota Ananthagiri Mandal Kodad Nalgond. q 508206, Bezgwada Anusha W/o Sreenivasa Reddy, Aged about 35 years, O_ccup: Hoqss Hold R/o H. No.
1-23lA Ramachandrapuram Nelakondapally tViandal Khammam 507160. ... PETITIONER D 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District Collector, Kongarakalan, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Artiile 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying tnai in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the. ' nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners lands i. e. an extent Ac. 01-00 extent of 00-20 Guntas, extent of 00-10 Guntas, extent of 00-10 Guntas totally admeasuring Ac. 02-00 out of Ac. 03-00, in Survey No.
51/8 and rat Bahadurguda Village & Gram Panchayath Shamshabad Mandal Reddy District, without following due process of law as being illegal, and against to principles of natural justice and Art. 300A of the of lndia, 1950 and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to preaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners lands without of law. Pt'ocess 20i! 5 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directions to the 4th respondent not to interfere with the peaceful Ac. O1-00 extent possession and enjoyment of the petitioners lands i. e. an extent Guntas, extent of 00-10 Guntas, extent of 00-10 Guntas totally Ac 02-00 out of Ac. 03-00, in Survey No. 51 18 & 5218, situated at Vil age and Gram Panchayath Shamshabad Mandal Ranga Reddy pending rlisposal of the writ petition. the F etitioner: SRI SHASHIDHAR GURUVULA the Fiespondents: SRI L.
RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE made the following: ORDER :, ":, , +,, $ffi&&il. ; .. *. ,; -;,. F' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No. 3O265 of 2o25 DATE OF ORDER: 11. 12. 2o. 25 Between: Sri L. M. V. V. Hari Prasad and others ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, rep. bY its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, HYderabad, and others .. Respondents ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief "... pleased to issue en appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly orue in the. nature of Wit of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfeirug with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners lands i. e. an extent Ac. )L-OO extent of OO-2O Guntaq--extent of Ac. OO-L) Guntas, extent of OO-1O Page 2 of6 Gu,ztas totally admeasuring Ac. 12-OO out of Ac. O3_OO, in su,ueg No. 51/8 and s2/8, situated.
at Bahadurguda vill,zge and Gram panchayath, shamshabad. Mandal, Rar'. ga Reddy District, without foltouting d. ue process o/ law as being illegal, arbitrary and, against to pritciples of nattLral justice and Art. 3o)A of the constitution of Inc)ia, 1950 arud consequently direct the 4th resportdent not to interfere with peacefut possession and enjoyrnent of petitioners lands without foltowing d"ue process of l,w arud to pass... " 2. Heard sri Shashidhar Guruvula, learned counsel for the petitioners and sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Governmr--nt Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner had purchased the land to an extent of r\c. 1. oo guntas in sy. No. sl/B and s2/g, Ac. o. 2o guntas, Ar:. 0. 10 guntas, Ac. O. 10 guntas out of Acs. 3. oo guntas, total admeasuring Ac. 2.
ooguntas, situated at Bahadurguca village and Gram panchayath Shamshabad Mandal, Re:nga Reddy District, having acquired the same from their predecessor through a registered sale deed bearing do<:ument No. 899 1 of 2oor , dated 26 . L2 . 2oor . Page 3 of6 originally the subject lands belongs to one Smt-Lateefunnisa Begum and upon her demise, her successors have filed O. S. No. 47BB of 2006 on the file of the learned VIII Junior civil Judge, city civil court, Hyderabad seeking succession. Accordingly, the said Suit was decreed in their favour on 10. 11 . 2006. As such, they were declared as true successors of Smt. Lateefunnisa Begum. Thereupon, the said successors have executed registered GPA in favour of third parties, from whom the subject land was purchased through registered sale deed. 4. white the things stood, the Tahsildar, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District uide Lr. No. Al l196512000, dated 08. 02.
2006 addressed a letter to the Assistant Director s and LRS Ranga Reddy District stating that as per the endorsement of the collector Ranga Reddy District dated 26. 12. 2005 he is enclosing the list o[ occupants in the private lands of Bahdurguda Village and requested to prepare and issue pattedar passbookltitle deed to the Ryot for the patta lands and also requested to update the pahani Page 4 of6 as per the list enclosed and the same was also commurlicatecl to the District Collector Ranga Reddy District and th,: Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division. Thereafter, respondent No. 4 uide L. NI. Bl 1604 l2Ol7, dated 23. O9. 2(t17 has written to Sub-Registrar, Shamshabad directing respondent No. 2 for cancellation of certain registereC sale deeds. Basing on the said letter, Sub- Registrar, Shamshabad has executed cancellation deeds stating that the land in Sy. Nos. 28 and 62 were belonging to governm<:nt only and the same is nothing to do with the petitioners lands.
The said act was done any ',vithout authority. and behind the back and without any right or title in favour cf the Government. 5. In the counter filed by respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 3647B of 2017, it is stated that, it is true that Smt. Latee. iunnisa Begum was pattedar of said land and other lands. The lands to an extent of Acs. 650. 00 guntas in Sy. Nos. 28 and 62 belongs to government as same are ceiling surplus lemds. Later, on 2O. O9. 2O25, the pfficials of Page 5 of6 that the visited subject property stating respondent No. 4 the Upon kno'*'ing the said subject lands belong to government. No'4 approached the office of respondent fact, the petitioners Sy. Nos. 2B 62 are classified and stated that only land in and as government land and the subject land is a private land and requested not to interfere and dispossess the petitioners from the subject property. But the respondent-authorities I are taking steps to dispossess the petitioners from the t subject land.
The action of the respondent-authorities is I highly arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice. Hence, the present writ petition' 6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that without following due procedure laid down under law, the respondent authorities will not take any action. Hence, seeks to pass appropriate orders' 7. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of available on record, the case and upon perusing the material this writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent- authorities not to interfere with the peaceful possession of Page 6 of6 petitione. rs from the subject property, without following due procedure laid down under law. If the petitioners are found in illegal possession or otherwise, take appropriate action by following the due procedure, strictly in accordance with law. There sh,all be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand dismissed. SD/. P.
PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR e //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Prircipal secretary, Revenue Department, state of Telangana, Secretarizrt, HYderabad Ranga Reddy District' 2. The Distrir:t Collector, Kongarakalan, lbrahimpatnam, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District' 3. The Reverue Divisional Officer, Reddy District' Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga 4. The Tahsildar, Shamshabad, Advocate 5. One CC to SRI SHASHIDHAR GURUVULA, [oPUC] Telangana at 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High court for the state of Hyderabad. [OUTI 7. Two CD CoPies MP/BSK Lw, HIGH C DATED:1 111212025 ( . ) -) 17 t * ORDER of 2025 WP. No. 30265 PETITION WRIT OF THE DISPOSING T COSTS fv\--1* \_. , aPP,
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.