HIRALAL GUPTA v. MUNNALAL GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-03. HIRALAL GUPTA v. MUNNALAL GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA. Read the judgment...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH rd ON THE 3 OF JANUARY, 2024 FIRST APPEAL No. 386 of 2008 BETWEEN:- HIRALAL GUPTA S/O LATE SHRI SALIGRAM GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O 867, BELBAGH WARD, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPELLANT (BY NONE) AND 1. MUNNALAL GUPTA (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS) MAHENDRA KUMAR GUPTA S/O MUNNALAL GUPTAAGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O C/O AZAD CHOWK, SADAR BAZAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. PUSHKARNATH GUPTA, S/O MUNNALAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 869, BELBAGH, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. DEEPAK GUPTA S/O MUNNALAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O 667, LAXMI NARAYAN VISHWAKARMA'S BADA, OPPOSITE BELBAGH THANA, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. KISHORE GUPTA S/O MUNNALAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O MUNNULAL JAISWAL'S BADA, BHARTIPUR WARD, BEHIND SHRIRAM VASTRA BHANDAR, BELBAGH, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. PINTU GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O 869, BELBAGH, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 6.
BHARTI GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O 869 BELBAGH, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. USHARANI GUPTA, WD/O MUNNALAL, AGED Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAJESH Signing time: 05-01-2024 10:52:03 ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O 869, BELBAGH, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 8. MITTULAL GUPTA S/O SALIGRAM GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O 868, BELBAG WARD, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 9. SMT. SARLA GUPTA, WD/O LATE SHRI JAWAHARLAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10-A GALI NO. 5 SADAR JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 10. ANIL GUPTA S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10-A, GALI NO. 5, SADAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 11. RAJU ALIAS ARUN S/O, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10-A, GALI NO. 5, SADAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 12. SMT. UMA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10- A, GALI NO. 5, SADAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 13. SMT. SANDHYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10-A, GALI NO. 5, SADAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 14. KU. INDRA GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10-A, GALI NO.
5, SADAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 15. MOTILAL S/O SALIGRAM GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O 10-A, ROAD NO. 5 SADAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 16. PANNALAL GUPTA S/O SALIGRAM GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O 870, BELBAG, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 17. MANOJ KUMAR S/O MANOHARLAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10, GALI NO. 5, SADAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 18. ASHISH GUPTA, S/O LATE MANOHARLAL GUPTA, 19. MANISH GUPTA S/O LATE MANOHARLAL GUPTA, Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAJESH Signing time: 05-01-2024 10:52:03 20. KU. EKTA GUPTA, D/O LATE MANOHARLAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10, GALI NO. 5, SADAR JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 21. BOBBY D/O LATE MANOHARLAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10, GALI NO. 5, SADAR, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 22. SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA S/O SALIGRAM GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 10-A, GALI NO. 5, SADAR JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 23. SMT. ASHOK W/O SHRI S. P.
GUPTA S/O SALIGRAM GUPTA R/O 5 DRELAND SOCIETY MEHSAHANA (GUJARAT) 24. SMT. SAROJ W/O SHANKARLAL R/O BRAHMANPURA, DISTRICT DURG (CHHATTISGARH) 25. SHAMBHOO DAYAL GUPTA, S/O KALADIN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O 249 INDRA PURI COLONY, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) 26. KAILASHNATH GUPTA S/O SHAMBHOONATH GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O 249 INDRA PURI COLONY, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH) 27. SMT. RANIBHAIYA D/O BAKKAL BAI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 16-A TAGORE NAGAR, PADRA ROAD, BARODA (GUJARAT) 28. NATTHULAL GUPTA S/O RAMADHAR GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O GODPARA BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) ..... RESPONDENTS (LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED-RESPONDENT NO. 1 BY SHRI SWAPNIL PALIWAL - ADVOCATE) This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAJESH Signing time: 05-01-2024 10:52:03 Today, none appeared for the appellant even in pass over round. Earlier also this appeal was dismissed and restored to file by order dated 12. 10. 2023.
None appeared on behalf of appellant on 08. 11. 2023 also. It appears that appellant has lost interest in prosecuting this appeal. Hence, it is dismissed for want of prosecution. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned court below. (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE RM Signature Not Verified Signed by: RAJESH Signing time: 05-01-2024 10:52:03
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.