B. NARASIMHA REDDY, R.R. DIST v. SPL COURT FOR CASES UNDER A.P. LAND GRABBING, HYD AND 9 OT
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-06. B. NARASIMHA REDDY, R.R. DIST v. SPL COURT FOR CASES UNDER A.P. LAND GRABBING, HYD AND 9 OT....
Judgment text
34131 [ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION NO:8495 OF 2015 Between: B. Narasimha Reddy, S/o. B. Laxma Reddy, aged about 70 years, Occupation Agriculture, R/o. Karmanghat Mllage, SaroornagarMandal, Ranga'Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER ANO 1. The Special Court for cases under A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, Rep. by its Registrar, B. R. K. R. Bhavan, Hyderabad. 2. Rajender Reddy, S/o. Ramchandra Reddy. 3. Ajender Reddy, S/o. Ramchandra Reddy. 4. S V-ejender Reddy, S/o. RamchaMra Reddy, (Respondents 2 to 4 Rt/o. 3-6- 36/48, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad) 5. Yarlagadda Raghu, S/o. Late Ragya Nayakulu 6. M/s. Recherla Foundations Limited, Rep. by its Director, Smt. Y. Bhavani, Wo. Y. Raghu Babu. (Respondents 4 to 6 are No.
34-5%114, Barkatpura, Hyderabad) 7. M/s. Recharla Finance Private Limited, Rep. by its Director, Y. Rajasekhar. M. Ramesh Babu, S/o. Veera Bhadra Rao, Occupation Business. 8. M. Ravinder Reddy, S/o. M. Chenna Kesava Reddy, Occupation Business. 9. Smt. M. Sridevi, Wo. M. Ravinder Reddy, Occupation Housewife. (Respondents 8 to 10 are R/o. 3-2-19, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad) ..... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ and quash the judgment in L. G. C. No. 28 of 2010, dated 04. 02. 2015, on the fite of the 1st respondent and consequently allow the same as prayed for.
Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents : -- The Court made the following ORDER / , THE HON'BLE SRIIUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No. 8495 OF 2015 L ORDER: (Per I{on'ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) When the matter was listed on 28. 71. 2024, as none aPPeared for the petitioner, this Court directed to list tfie matter on 29. 71. 2024 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, none aPPeared for the petitioner, despite listing the matter under the caption'for dismissal'. Therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Writ Petition for default or non-prosecu tion. i 1 i, 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD'-P. CH.
NAGABHUSHAMBA, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1 \ /,TRUE COPY'/ ECTION OFFICER to Advocate tOPUcl ,. on" CC to M/s BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES' 2. Two CD CoPies SA PSK (k HIGH COURT DATED:0611212024 ORDER S TA 14: 1 4 'r WP. No. 8495 of 2015 ,j 1 i FEB 2025 o f. / t g'O Dr- par s c"] \ DISMISSING THE W. P FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS. (+ l0 u A cD+^! \
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.