Skip to main content
LawSphereX

TANWEER ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Court: High Court of Jharkhand

Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-06. TANWEER ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7227 of 2024 1. Tanweer Ansari 2. Mofil Ansari 3. Samser Ansari ….. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party ----- CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners: Mr. K. S. Nanda For the State: Mr. Achinto Sen, A. P. P ----- 05/06. 12. 2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with the case registered under Section 379 IPC have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and have not committed any offence as alleged in the F. I. R. Initially, the FIR was lodged by the informant against unknown persons for committing theft of his motorcycle bearing registration no. JH-01-AJ/3263. Subsequently, the I. O of this case got information that the said motorcycle was kept in the premises of Puso P.

S from where he further got information that the same had allegedly been recovered from the possession of the petitioners while they were committing theft of cattle in Village-Panilata. It is further submitted that the said allegation is completely false. Except the case registered in Puso P. S as well as the present one, no other criminal case is pending against the petitioners. They however undertake to cooperate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, they may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned A. P. P opposes the petitioners’ prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the above named petitioners are directed to surrender before the concerned Court below within a period of three weeks. If they surrender before the Court below within the aforesaid period, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

20,000/- (twenty thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount st each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1 Class, Gumla in connection with Bharno P. S. Case No. 28/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Satish/- (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)

Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.