Smt. Dr. Sangeeta Sharam v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.SURENDER
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-04-23. Smt. Dr. Sangeeta Sharam v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
132511 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2857 OF 2021 Between: Smt. Dr. Sangeeta Sharam, w/o. D. V. S. Sharma Raman, aged 55 years Occ Doctor R/o. Plot No. 80, O. U. T. Colony Sainikpuri, Secunderabad ... PETITIONERYACCUSED NO. 2 AND 'l . The State of Telangana, Kusaiguda Police Station Rachakonda Distirct. T. S Rep. by its Public Prosecutor. ... RESPONDENT 2. Smt. B. Viday Raj, w/o. B. Sai Raj aged 52 years Occ. Pharmacist at NFC, Rl/o Sanjeevani NFC, ECIL, Rachakonda District, T. S. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the F. l. R. No .
162 of 2021 dated 02-03-2021 registered under Sections 323, 506 of IPC r/w Section 3(1) (0 (s) of SC and ST (POA) Amendment Act of 2015 on the file of Kushaiguda Police Station, Rachakonda District against the Petitioner. l. A. NO: 2OF 2021 Petition under Section ,182 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in F. l. R. No. 162 of 2021 dated 02-03- 2021 registered under Sections 323, 506 of IPC r/w Section 3(1) (r) (s) of SC and ST (POA) Amendment Act of 2015 on the file of Kushaiguda Police Station Rachakonda District of State of retangana including the appearance of the Petitioner in the First Respondent's office. l. A. f,lO: 4OF 2021 Between: Smt. B. Viday Raj,lv/o. B. Sai Raj aged 52 years pharmacist Occ. at NFC, R/o Sanjeevani NFC, ECIL, Rachakonda District, T. S. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT AND 1 Smt. Dr. Sangeeta Sharam, w/o. D. V. S.
Sharma Raman, aged 55 years Occ. ' Doctor Rl/o. Plot No. 80, O. U. T Colony Sainikpuri, Secundeiabad ... PETITIONERYACCUSED NO. 2 2 The State of Telangana, Kusaiguda police Station Rachakonda Distirct. T. S Rep. by its Public Prosecutor. ... RESPONDENT Petition under Section 482 of cr. p. c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of petition, criminal the High court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 7104t2o21 passed in l. A. No. 2 t2o21 in crr. P. No. 285712021 . l. A. NO: 3 OF 2021 Petition under Section 482 of cr. p. c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds petition, of criminal the High court may be pleased to extend the stay granted on 07104t2021 up till 1510612021 . This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lVlemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri G. sudha, Advocate for the Petitioner, Dr. B. Karthik Navayan, Advocate on behalf of Respondent No. 2 and sri M.
vivekananda Reddy, Assistant public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2857 OF 2O2L ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/A-2 seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR. No. I62 of 2O2I, on the hle of Kusaiguda Police Station, Rachakonda. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/A-2 and Sri M. Vivekanarda Reddy, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent State. 3. This Court by order dated 07. O4. 2O21 passed the following order: - "Notice to 2"d respondent. Personal notice is permitted. List on 29-O4-2O2L Referring to the complaint dated O2-O3-2O21 learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there are no ailegations much less specilic allegations against the petitioner herein. She also belongs to Scheduled Caste I community. In proof of the same she has hled copy of the t Caste Certificate issued in favour of her neice.
The \ t Investigating Offrcer has already issued notice under Section 41-A of Cr. P. C. , to the petitioner herein and she has already submitted her reply, dated 23-03-2021. Even then, according to learned counsei for the petitioner, without considering the same and also the documents furnished by the petitioner herein along with the said reply, the Investigating Officer is harassing the petitioner herein under the guise of investigation. Several documents fi1ed by the petitioner herein requires examination. Therefore, there shall be stay of all further proceedings inlcuding the arrest of the petitioner in Crime No. 162 of 2O2l in respect of petitioner herein /A 2 only, LlIl 29-04-2021 . , However, it is made clear that the investigation may go on in respect of other accused. " 4. Since the crime is of the year, 2021, this Criminal petition is disposed of extending the relief granted to the petitioner by this Court on 07 . O4 . 2021.
The Investigating Officer shall not arrest the petitioner and conclude investigation as expeditiousiy as possible, keeping in view the pending disputes between the parties. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, sha1l stand closed. Sd/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER t To, I 1. The XIX Addl. Metropolitan ltllagistrate, Cyberabad at Malkajgiri. I 2. The SHO, P. S. , Kushaiguda . 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to Ms. G. Sudha, Advocate, [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI Dr. B. Karthik NAvayan, Advocate, [OPUC]. 6. Two CD Copies KRI(PSLA/H -; -'a€e |,".. HIGH COURT DATED: 2310412025 al l1 E S (c { ( --) ( ( 29JUt 2025 \, ) ORDER ,. ,,, \.. CRLP. No. 2857 of 2021 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF a
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.