MR SHAIK VAZEER SULTHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2026-04-17. MR SHAIK VAZEER SULTHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRL. P No. 17661 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17661 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR SHAIK VAZEER SULTHAN, S/O SHAIK HABIDH ALI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, R/A. NO. 1-5-68 SHIVAPIYAM, SOUTH SIDE WARD NO. 1, VISAKHAPATNAM, NEAR NUKALAMMA TEMPLE, NARSIPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN CODE-531116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANU, ADVOCATE FOR SMT H R TANUJA, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY BAYYAPPPANAHALLI RAILWAY POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU 560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI RANGASWAMY R, HCGP) THIS CRL. P IS FILED U/S. 439 (FILED U/S. 483 BNSS) CR. P. C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO GRANT REGULAR BAIL TO THE PRESENT PETITIONER, THE ACCUSED NO. 1, IN CR. NO. 67/2024 NOW REGISTERED AS SPL. C. C. NO.
177/2025 FOR OFFENCE P/US/ 20(b)(ii)(C) OF NDPS ACT 1985 REGISTERED BY RESPONDENT BAYYAPPANAHALLI RAILWAY POLICE STATION, BENGALURU - 2 - CRL. P No. 17661 of 2025 PENDING ON THE FILE BEFORE XXXIV ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS) AT BENGALURU (CCH-35). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER This petition is filed seeking bail. Charge sheet is filed for the offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('NDPS Act'). It is submitted that earlier on four occasions before this Court, the bail petitions have been rejected. This is the fifth petition. 2. It is submitted that there is an assault on the petitioner in the jail by jail mates. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, there is a changed circumstance and taking note of the same, the bail has to be granted. 3.
The Court is of the view that the said ground cannot be a ground to grant bail. In case there is an assault, the jail authorities have to ensure such incident - 3 - CRL. P No. 17661 of 2025 does not take place and appropriate action is to be initiated against the offender as advised in law. This Court does not find any reason to allow the petition. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CHS List No. : 4 Sl No. : 5
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.